FTP Answers 11/10

[kslghost]

Wow, that sounds very interesting...!!!!

[HSB]

[ QUOTE ]
For the deep stack lovers (mostly in other threads), I've spent all day getting a new feature in for you.

New deep stack NL ring games. 50 big blind minimum, with a 200 big blind maximum.

The table name will have a "(deep)" or "(deep 6)" added to the end. You can find them at the following stakes:

$0.15/$.30
$.40/$.80
$1.50/$3
$4/$8
$15/$30
$150/$300

Tables are being created now.

[/ QUOTE ]

I like 'em

[ajmargarine]

[ QUOTE ]
For the deep stack lovers (mostly in other threads), I've spent all day getting a new feature in for you.

New deep stack NL ring games. 50 big blind minimum, with a 200 big blind maximum.

The table name will have a "(deep)" or "(deep 6)" added to the end. You can find them at the following stakes:

$0.15/$.30
$.40/$.80
$1.50/$3
$4/$8
$15/$30
$150/$300

Tables are being created now.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, that's nice.

But....

Please at least comment on the regular NL tables, re:

min buyin of 20bb
default of 40bb

[FTPDoug]

For NL tables:
"min buyin of 20bb
default of 40bb"

As a player, I would like to see this raised also. I also see it as something that would benefit 95% of the members of this forum, but only 5% of our overall customers.

By creating cap games and deep games, I think we have two good extremes, and the games in the middle seem to have worked so far.

That being said, we're always willing to consider changes. I did really like the idea of player's default buy-ins being stored in their preferences somewhere so that every time they open a table, it's right for them.

[Buzz-cp]

Hey FT,

Pokerstars has a "sit out next blind" checkbox for their speed tables. This is a great option. This would even be better for any ring game. Do you see this coming to Full Tilt any time soon?

Buzz

[FTPDoug]

"Pokerstars has a "sit out next blind" checkbox for their speed tables. This is a great option. This would even be better for any ring game. Do you see this coming to Full Tilt any time soon?"


That's a great idea Buzz. I'm forwarding it on. Sending stuff like this to feedback@fulltiltpoker.com is a good way to get a feature done.

Thanks,

Doug

[MikeyPatriot]

How long will it take for more stakes to be added to the deep games? .40/.80/$160 buyin and 1.5/3/$600 buyin are too low and too high for me respectively.

[PennDisc]

I think a .75/1.50 would be a great in-between level. But then again I'd be perfectly satisfied just playing the regular $200 NL games anyway.

[Gildwulf]

deep stack games, wowowowowoow this is amazing


edit":

can you add something between

$1.50/$3
$4/$8

That's a jump from 600 to 1600...pretty big gap

gw

[Gildwulf]

also I agree 100% with aj:

[ QUOTE ]
Please raise the minimum buy-in at NL tables. 20bb's is way too low.
Please raise the default buy-in at NL tables. Have it at 100bb's, like Party did (does).

[/ QUOTE ]