#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am so confused at a limp-raise after limper 200nl
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Without reads on Villain a limp-rr is almost always AA/KK. [/ QUOTE ] This is a myth: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...Number=7722314 It is KK/AA reasonably often but it is <<< QQ more often at least based on the data I collected. rvg [/ QUOTE ] Not to mention it was CO OVER-limping, then 3-betting small. Weird, stupid, idiotic line. This is almost never AA, but from this player, it is, make a note of it, call $10 with QQ next time he does this and get all-in on a Q-flop. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I am so confused at a limp-raise after limper 200nl
I rarely 4-bet it PF. Only w. history. I think that calling the $12 is probably best.
|
|
|