Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-19-2006, 04:03 PM
psyduck psyduck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,149
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

[ QUOTE ]
call, the king is a relative blank

donkeys plz stop posting advice, there REALLY needs to be a poster rating system

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree SO MUCH. Also people asking for results within 5 minutes of the initial post need to be turbo-banned.

The timing of his bets are fairly important here.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-19-2006, 04:26 PM
Get_better_Baris Get_better_Baris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 3 BaRReLing yOUr MoMmA FoO
Posts: 692
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

MDMA. I respect you post and u are def a great player and there is no need to call my post retarted if u disagree. I don't have many post but I have been playing for a good amount of time and been a lurker here for a long time. Maybe I have a hard time typing what I was trying to get at. I have made harder calldowns than this and prolly so have everyone of us if we are putting the oppenent on a bluff but he asked and I said take a stand with something stronger. Like if we hit top pair with an q k or ace we r gonna be a better % ahead of him Not with a hand he could be 25-34% to lose after the flop. Usu. People bluff there stack away as the pfr not a caller leading into a pfr.
Just yesterday I was calling down a player with 55 and he rivers a pair but he was 25% to win after the flop and I let him get there because I wanted to check call with just 5's.With aggress. Players you can find a better spot to let them bluff their stack to you
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-19-2006, 04:36 PM
Rick305 Rick305 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Nothing Exceeds like Excess
Posts: 1,500
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

[ QUOTE ]
Rick,

That is also very bad advice.


[/ QUOTE ]

With the history I have with villian, I believe my advice is spot on.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-19-2006, 04:40 PM
Ryendal Ryendal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 899
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

I am a little OOT but please, paragraph is your friend
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-19-2006, 04:46 PM
Get_better_Baris Get_better_Baris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 3 BaRReLing yOUr MoMmA FoO
Posts: 692
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

Timing is important here. If they insta bet. To me in live play it usu. Means they were on a huge bluff/semi bluff first or they have super hand and they don't have to think about if to value bet thin.this is the case in the uncapped games I play.

Also. If I ever bluff this flop I would do it with kQ(maybe I bluff with diferent cards than u do in this spot) or ak that just called pre just in case he has 9 thru qq here to leave myself with some outs. I also would push a king if I hit it since no raise on turn to make it look like a bluff. Since I am only worried about AA or a set just calling unlikly 2 streets. Prolly has 10jj qq or a 9. I understand when u say k is a blank because it doesn't fit in with the hand but it wouldnt always be against me so I c it different because I bluff with kq and along with 86s. Also villian can have beat anyway we don't know.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-19-2006, 05:04 PM
9cao 9cao is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 878
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

IMO there is no right or wrong answer here. Based on what I am reading about Villain he is capable of 3 barreling here a certain % of the time and has a big hand another %. It also sounds like you play with him a lot.

Therefore, as part of your overall mixed strategy, a certain % of the time you are going to have to make some calldowns like this one. Whether he had a hand or not is kind of irrelevant, as long as you are not calling down too often or not calling down enough based on whatever his bluffing frequency is.

I agree with whoever said you have to make your decision on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-19-2006, 05:08 PM
Maulik Maulik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 7,758
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

9cao/others,

When you make your decision on the turn, are we shoving the turn or calling the river shove?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-19-2006, 05:39 PM
KRANTZ KRANTZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the 1980s
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

[ QUOTE ]
9cao/others,

When you make your decision on the turn, are we shoving the turn or calling the river shove?

[/ QUOTE ]

calling the river, if you shove the turn he better call you with a worse hand, otherwise there's no point. just calling the turn let's him continue to bluff on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-19-2006, 06:15 PM
MDMA MDMA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,648
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

I so do not agree with anyone saying one should make up ones mind on turn, this is [censored].
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-19-2006, 06:23 PM
creedofhubris creedofhubris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Now Coaching
Posts: 4,469
Default Re: A TPTK hand vs a aggressive villain.

how long did *you* take to call his turn bet? If the answer is "a long time", then I'd lean towards a call. Otherwise, I got nothing, so I'd probably fold.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.