|
|
#21
10-14-2006, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Juiciness of Sites : post legistlation
OP:
WTF tables are u playing at? Party has been completely unplayabe for the last 2 days. u realize that US players can still observe tabes, and hence know what they are and are not missing, right? There's typically 1 or 2 playable tables at any one time at 20/40+ or 5/10NL+, which typically break within 5 minutes. 
|
|
#22
10-14-2006, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Juiciness of Sites : post legistlation
Yeah, boy I wish I lived in a country that banned online poker and where Im' more likely to die from a bullet than a car crash. Yaaaay, USA.
|
|
#23
10-14-2006, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Juiciness of Sites : post legistlation
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, boy I wish I lived in a country that banned online poker and where Im' more likely to die from a bullet than a car crash. Yaaaay, USA. [/ QUOTE ] Bolded part is ridiculously untrue, I have no idea where you're getting that statistic from.
|
|
#24
10-15-2006, 01:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Juiciness of Sites : post legistlation
a large part of the tightness at 100NL is likely due to higher limit players who haven't gotten enough money on yet to play their normal levels.
For example, me. I normally play 400NL, but with the current deposit limits I will be playing 100NL for at least another week, barring a streak of really good luck.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
