Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-02-2006, 11:31 PM
HSB HSB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,378
Default Re: Checks are not exempted in the Act, but could be in the Regs

[ QUOTE ]
A bit confused perhaps. The Act says "NO CHECKS", but the Regs could exempt checks from what Banks need to scrutinize. I won't speculate on the effect of such a regulation, but I would really welcome its formulation.

However, acceptance of checks would still be illegal, if the Site is covered by the Act.

(My other posts pretty much spell out why I do not think the "poker-only" business model is covered.)

[/ QUOTE ]

The confusion is due to the fact that you're talking about two things.

Accepting deposits by any method is going to be illegal and if you do it you could conceivably be extradited to the US, tried, convicted, and sent to prison for up to five years. We appreciate you taking that risk though quite frankly I think it's a pretty small one.

The regulations are going to outline the things that the banks are liable for. The stuff you want to read starts on page 231 of the bill.
the bill

This is the part that defines the policies and procedures to identify and prevent restricted transactions.

It states that the Federal Reserve and Attorney General need to come up with the policies and procedures. It says they need to come up with procedures, let the banks choose from among procedures that work, and "exempt certain restricted transactions or designated payment systems from any requirement imposed under such regulations if the Secretary and Board joinly find that it is not reasonably practical to identify and block, or otherwise prevent or prohibit the acceptance of, such transactions"

That literally means that if the Attorney General and the Federal Reserve think that it's too hard to block this stuff then nothing gets blocked.

A bank is considered in compliance with the law if they follow those regulations so if those regulations don't prohibit paper checks because it's too much of a pain in the ass to look at every damn check then no bank is going to bother trying to block paper checks. And if that happens then the sites will be able to print checks as has been mentioned in a bunch of other places.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.