#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pocket 4\'s in BB, flopped set
[ QUOTE ]
we want to at least try protect our set against a variety of gutshot straight draws out there that threaten our hand [/ QUOTE ] Protecting our set? That is one bizare case of MUBS IMO. If you are only using the cr to build a pot with hands better than a set you are missing out. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pocket 4\'s in BB, flopped set
[ QUOTE ]
Horrendous. Not capping that river is a crime. [/ QUOTE ] Can we have some more explanation? If the villian is solid (and maybe I'm reading too much into that read, but I'm thinking 2+2 type player) what does he play this way that we beat? Now that I typed that and thought a little I might be changing my mind. Assuming solid does mean a 2+2er then QQ and JJ are out since he'd 3 bet pf. AQs or KQs would be possibilities pf (I keep liking KQs as an option since the turn gives him an OESD). QJs is a possibility depending on the table, maybe QTs if is is really loose. There are more AQs/KQs available then QJs so maybe going nuts on the river is correct. Actually after going through that it might be better to cap the river against a "solid" player since we take a few hands out of his range (QQ, JJ) that beat us. The more I look at the hand, the more I think this guy can't be 2+2 solid, so I think I'm still leaving QQ and JJ in his range. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pocket 4\'s in BB, flopped set
I wouldn't cap the river.
I would 3-bet the turn though. |
|
|