|
|
#25
01-24-2006, 03:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Geniusness at the 215\'s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Im confused what the argument is here, but this is really an unbelievably easy fold. [/ QUOTE ] I don't understand why [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img], the short stack has been forced all-in... [/ QUOTE ] And you should stay out of the way and let him lose. If he wins his pot and the big stack wins a side pot with you, you're out in 3rd, leaving a stack with like 90 chips in to take 2nd. It's so colossally -$ev, it's crazy. 
|
|
#26
01-24-2006, 03:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Geniusness at the 215\'s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1%??? [/ QUOTE ] yea hes making the point that even if he busts ONE % of the time its STILL too much. holla [/ QUOTE ] Dont believe thats true at all..in that case it would be an easy call [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#27
01-24-2006, 03:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Geniusness at the 215\'s
[ QUOTE ]
because 1% chance that you bust in 3rd is too much chance to bust in 3rd. c [/ QUOTE ] ok yeah, n/m. i just did the math. if it's 33%/33%/33%, calling is worse than -2 compared to folding. but, it seems like calling with a slightly higher pair like 55 would be correct.
|
|
#28
01-24-2006, 03:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Geniusness at the 215\'s
[ QUOTE ]
because 1% chance that you bust in 3rd is too much chance to bust in 3rd. c [/ QUOTE ] Even if you have a 99% chance to double up? I'm thinking 1% is about the odds you bust out there with AA, for example, but I'm not folding AA.
|
|
#29
01-24-2006, 03:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Geniusness at the 215\'s
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 1%??? [/ QUOTE ] yea hes making the point that even if he busts ONE % of the time its STILL too much. holla [/ QUOTE ] Dont believe thats true at all..in that case it would be an easy call [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH you people pick apart eveything i say. i gotta be more literal. holla
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
