#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TPTK vs solid mulittabling TAG
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see how you can fold anywhere other than the flop. [/ QUOTE ] |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TPTK vs solid mulittabling TAG
To everyone who says fold flop, isn't never calling a flop raise with less than a set on this sort of board pretty exploitable? Your hand is so close to the top of the range he should be putting you on that if you're folding it shouldn't he have a clear and automatic bluff raise any time you bet a dry flop like this?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TPTK vs solid mulittabling TAG
[ QUOTE ]
To everyone who says fold flop, isn't never calling a flop raise with less than a set on this sort of board pretty exploitable? Your hand is so close to the top of the range he should be putting you on that if you're folding it shouldn't he have a clear and automatic bluff raise any time you bet a dry flop like this? [/ QUOTE ] Luckily, you are allowed to adapt if your opponent keeps bluff raising you. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TPTK vs solid mulittabling TAG
it would be tough to figure that out tho
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TPTK vs solid mulittabling TAG
[ QUOTE ]
To everyone who says fold flop, isn't never calling a flop raise with less than a set on this sort of board pretty exploitable? [/ QUOTE ] Exploitable is definitely not the word, as all the Villain would know is that he bet in position after everyone checked to him, then folded once he c/r'ed... nothing to exploit there. Calling the flop is the only questionable part of the hand, really. But if you are ever folding once you called the flop and hit a perfect turn, why would you ever call flop? I play it same. I think you're more often ahead here than behind. Kirk |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: TPTK vs solid mulittabling TAG
The turn doesn't really help much against SB. Either he's restealing based on Hero's supposed flop steal or his hand is still better than Hero's after the second J falls. I really don't see SB having 32 or AA-QQ.
|
|
|