Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-24-2006, 02:55 PM
keikiwai keikiwai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi. My name is Rosa Kato <3
Posts: 19,541
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

Set over set. Top set goes broke. Standard. *Yawn*
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-24-2006, 02:57 PM
Matt1975 Matt1975 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: even to a worm
Posts: 437
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

Change your name pre-flop. A real Matt wouldn't be such a whiny b'tch.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:00 PM
mak15 mak15 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: u penn
Posts: 2,093
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

OP,

you aren't good at poker.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:02 PM
yvesaint yvesaint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,779
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

[ QUOTE ]
No, i used to be a winning NL400 player for quite awhile (worked my way up from NL25 and 10k later... i was playing NL400)

Played there for a few months, was doing well, then i got hit with the whammy. everything turned to crap, nothing held up, my won @ showdown was in the high 60s, but i was posting 3-4 losing days a week, as opposed to 1 a week to 10 days before. Nothing changed regarding my play. I had to cash out about half my roll (4.5k) and i dropped down to NL200 again with around 3.7k or something. Played there for awhile, still posting more losing sessions than winning sessions, i was losing more days t han winning, as I was winning a lot of small pots, but every big pot i was losing whether i was a 3-1 4-1 or 10-1 favorite.

this all happened as i switched to RB. I was very weary of what was happening so i switched sites. Still losing money (breaking about even with bonuses tho).

when my bonuses ran out, i started getting whittled away, slowly but surely, i made some donk decisions namely taking a shot at a higher limit, lost to a couple failed bluffs, and a few 8-1 suckouts, and redeposited for the first tie in a year.

from then on i cant seem to win at any limit because im running so ridiculously bad. the swings in my BR were ridiculously large, even playing as super tight as i was (i was something stupid like 12/4/2 at full ring.

i would have 8 Buyin swings semi regularly, always down (because of setup hands or missed draws, or just freakish suckouts) because people were calling anything and everything at NL50/NL100. and after a couple losing weeks, i decided to move back up to 2/4

so i decided i was going to play NL400 underrolled, because i can actually play poker there. well that didn;t go well. .. and i busted... again. redeposited (again), started playing 6max to exploit weaker players and play a bit looser and outplay my opponents more often and force them into making mistakes.

same deal though, i would grind away all day, winning small pots. then get all in for 200+ BB pots as a big favorite on turn/flop, and get outdrawn, and be back to even or negative on the day. that would occur a number of times, and i would be a small winner or a big loser on the day.

i stopped playing 6m last night, and switched back to full ring (with a big deposit bonus/rakeback) -- so i could play a bunch tighter, and wait for nuts/2nd nuts and reduce variance overall-- at NL25 and NL50 after losing the remainder of my roll at NL50 and NL100 in the span of 2 hours as a 5-1, 8-1, 7-1 and 19-1 favorite (4 big hands), and busted... again.

upon resuming play at full ring, i went negatively rather quickly losing 2 all in pots to runner runner, but reclaiming lost $$ that as i got my money in with the villain drawing dead.

today... about the same story. started my 1st 150 hands down 4 buyins as I lost 2 all in pots... one to runner runner, the 2nd to a 2 outer on the river. Reclaimed some of that as i got my money in with quads and flush vs made straight, and picked off a few people's all in bluffs on broken draws.

Yes, I whine. yes im a crybaby. But as far as im concerned, its my god given right to [censored] over the internet, after running ice cold (and having the worst beats/luck of my life) for 2 months straight and being a losing player even at the lowest limits, losing time and time again to the biggest donks on the planet, after being a steady winner for so long, and now not even being able to win at the lowest limits is the most frustrating thing ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

BLAH BLAH BLAH
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:03 PM
matt2411 matt2411 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

Again, Why I cant beat microlimits, and why odds just aren't realistic. Not even close to 9-1 this time but 2.5-1 and 4-1. I am now -95 on the day (~3 buyins) with sets. There's nothing i can do about these hands, i make the perfect play and just get outdrawn, thats all.

----------------------------------------
Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $.50 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

CO ($34.10)
Button ($42.10)
SB ($55.60)
Hero ($37.75)
UTG ($18.70)
UTG+1 ($20.75)
MP1 ($49.90)
MP2 ($12.25)
MP3 ($18.40)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP2 calls $0.50, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $2</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero calls $1.50, UTG+1 calls $1.50, MP2 folds.

Flop: ($6.75) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $6</font>, UTG+1 calls $6, CO folds.

Turn: ($18.75) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $13</font>, UTG+1 calls $12.75 (All-In).

River: ($44.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players, 1 all-in)</font>
MP2 calls $12.75 (All-In).

Final Pot: $57.25

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
Hero has 5d 5h (three of a kind, fives).
UTG+1 has 7c 6s (straight, seven high).
Outcome: UTG+1 wins $44.25. Hero wins $13. </font>



2nd one was screwed up by the HH converter so i just posted it on pokerhand.org

http://www.pokerhand.org/?424876

nothing i can really do about either of em.

but yeah so far im 1-5 with sets in big pots. 19-1 , 2.5-1, 4-1, and 8-1 favorites respectively. only won i won at showdown with was with KK on an AKx flop, he had AJ, where i was a 19-1 favorite again.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:09 PM
keikiwai keikiwai is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi. My name is Rosa Kato <3
Posts: 19,541
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

Yeah, OESDs NEVAH get there...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:09 PM
numeri numeri is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: living dangerously
Posts: 1,808
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

Matt,

What are you looking for from BBV?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:10 PM
matt2411 matt2411 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

[ QUOTE ]
matt, since you obviously have PT or something to track these results, show me definitive proof that over 100K hands, you're W@SD rate is 20-40% with 9-1 or better all the money going in on the flop and i'll pay you whatever your current bankroll is.

[/ QUOTE ]

rofl my roll is at something stupidly low like 250 or something.

however if you know a parsing program for PT where i can search for hands with pots over 150 BBs or so, so i can at least find those hands, and then check it out by hand so its only an hour's worth of work or so, i'll definitely do that
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:12 PM
matt2411 matt2411 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

[ QUOTE ]
Matt,

What are you looking for from BBV?

[/ QUOTE ]

absolutely nothing, just ranting my frustration off is all
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-24-2006, 03:17 PM
Stealthy Stealthy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Contemplating life
Posts: 2,813
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

It is funny that BBV was created largely so that players had a place to vent/brag. Yet every time someone vents in the place designed for it they get shouted down. Strange.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.