Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-27-2006, 06:45 PM
Mercman572 Mercman572 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ithacompton. The mean streets of...
Posts: 2,357
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Edge,

Thanks a ton bro, we really apreciate you stopping by. Please try to more often!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-27-2006, 11:47 PM
edge edge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

[ QUOTE ]
Have you ever thought that your style might someday hold you back from bigger games though? Like 50/100?

[/ QUOTE ]

I play 25/50 full ring fairly often, and I am doing extremely well (luckboxing). When I'm paying attention to a specific table, I play a little bit looser and make more moves preflop in position. I expect that playing tight in high-stakes games would actually work better than in lower-stakes games; the high-stakes games are very aggressive and tricky preflop, and I could wait for a good hand and capitalize on frequent light reraises. I haven't tried 6-max above 10/20 though.

The whole thing about TAG vs LAG is overblown on 2+2. The words themselves have little meaning anymore, and effectively mean "tight" and "loose". Personally, I have little trouble with sam and bld, but B Buddy is a very good loose player who forces a lot of difficult decisions on me. A good loose player will play more hands with the weaker players, so that's a plus for his winrate. However, he'll also be playing hands against other good players with a weaker range than a tight player. That's a minus for his winrate. All in all, there isn't really a big advantage to playing loose. The best 10/20 player, loloTRICKEDu, plays a tight 21/14 style, but he makes lots of moves preflop. Although it's cool to play loose as far as 2+2 is concerned, I can't be bothered to go through the variance that comes along with it. I play 8/9 tables of 6-max comfortably with my style (since I'm folding most of the time), and rarely time out.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-27-2006, 11:52 PM
ajmargarine ajmargarine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: one decision
Posts: 12,050
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Edge,

tx for the thread. Mucho appreciated.

--aj
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 06-28-2006, 12:09 AM
bent96 bent96 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I\'m going to have a really long and curious location so that people will have to click on my name to see how it concludes. To anyone reading this- OWNED!
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Edge,

we should call samo down here. Man do I wish that guy would make a video...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 06-28-2006, 06:09 AM
Dory Dory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 178
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Thanks heaps for this edge.

The big thing that it made me realise is that I should be playing hands that I am comfortable playing and not trying to play hands I have read should be played.

I have just moved to 6 max from full ring and was playing way too loose for my comfort zone and my winrate was suffering (positive, but barely - which is bad at 50NL).

Once my comfort level rises at six max I can loosen up perhaps.

Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 06-28-2006, 09:35 AM
aflaba aflaba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,943
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

I really like your post. Respect!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-28-2006, 09:46 AM
BukNaked36 BukNaked36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,419
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Excellent post Edge and very timely for me personally.

You alluded to playing pairs for set value but made it sound like that was a thing of the past. Are you raising all pocket pairs now when opening?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-28-2006, 09:59 PM
edge edge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Wow. This board moves really quickly.

I rarely call a raise out of position with a small pair looking to spike a set if I think the pot is going to be heads-up. It doesn't work out to be profitable for me; this can be determined just by looking at raising ranges and what hands are needed to pay off on different boards and so on. Same goes with openlimping small pairs. I find that it's profitable for me to openraise any hand I want to play and c-bet 95% of the time. Again, this is something that comes about through experimentation. I know some very good players that openlimp and also incorporate the limp-reraise, which I never use at 6-max. Just personal preference again.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-28-2006, 10:03 PM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Edge,

i'm really intuiged to know about cbetting as you move up. I mean, at the higher levels, surely every1 knows that every1 cbets. And as a result, surely it become almost +EV to just C/R or raise any cbet on any flop?

Do players just regularly let the pot get taken by cbets, or do they play back often? Is there a rediculous amount of floating of cbets?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 06-28-2006, 10:26 PM
edge edge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Found this PM; maybe it is useful? (preflop play)

Flop play turns into a bizarre game of rock/paper/scissors a lot of the time simply because one can rely on the raiser to c-bet close to 100% of the time. The problem with checkraising or raising every c-bet is that, contrary to what is said in TOP, the raiser tends to have a stronger starting hand than the caller. This is because a strong starter facing a raise will often result in a reraise, so a call shows some weakness. This allows the raiser to push over top of the raise or checkraise, and forces the caller to make a tough decision. Floating and second/third barrel bluffing becomes important as well, since a flop c-bet means close to nothing.

Regardless, I find that the basic texture of most games is that players fold to c-bets too often, so I play far more hands as a raiser than as a caller.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.