Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-27-2006, 03:02 PM
lassie lassie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 371
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

[ QUOTE ]
if we are gonna see a draw 8/10 times

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats my guess, but I posted this hand to hear some other opinions.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-27-2006, 03:29 PM
lassie lassie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 371
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

Well, actually I got a comment more on my reraise to 110.

Villain is as I mentioned getting something like 3:1 when I reraise to 110, but he only completes his draw (if he got for example AQh, AJh) 25% on the turn, so I actually dont understand why my reraise is so critical.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-27-2006, 05:34 PM
lassie lassie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 371
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

Any comments?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-27-2006, 07:03 PM
tmacs1 tmacs1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 99
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

Absolutely nothing is a bit of an exaggeration. Many players would check raise with AK and combo draws like AQs. Two pair is also possible A10 etc. I don't see how you can fold in this spot. If villain turns over 1010, or KK, that's poker. most of the time he won't, and thats what is important.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-27-2006, 07:05 PM
tmacs1 tmacs1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 99
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

Lassie, do you have any reads on opponents starting requirements?? does he open with SCs etc??
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-27-2006, 07:08 PM
tmacs1 tmacs1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 99
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

creedofhubris, why would you want to commit yourself to a pot you might easily lose?? what if you make a large raise and turn comes Js?? wtf now?? By your reasoning we have to call and we're probably drawing slim.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-27-2006, 07:13 PM
tmacs1 tmacs1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 99
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

I agree, pushing is too much. But I would 3 bet bigger.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-27-2006, 07:37 PM
Thremp Thremp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Free Kyleb
Posts: 10,163
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

[ QUOTE ]
creedofhubris, why would you want to commit yourself to a pot you might easily lose?? what if you make a large raise and turn comes Js?? wtf now?? By your reasoning we have to call and we're probably drawing slim.

[/ QUOTE ]

How are we drawing slim [censored]?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-27-2006, 07:59 PM
tmacs1 tmacs1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 99
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

If turn is jack spades, if he was drawing we're beat, and if he had 1010 KK we're dead. Thats what I mean
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-28-2006, 04:52 AM
lassie lassie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 371
Default Re: Nl200, 99 vs LAG deep

How much do you guys suggest I three-bet on this flop? To like a 150 or?

tmacs1, I really dont see villain checking any made hand on this flop, because we could easily take a free card and outdraw him. Lots of cards on the turn could make his hand really ugly or kill his action.

By the way, the villain is as mentioned pretty solid.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.