|
|
#24
05-16-2006, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4.6 BB/100, 50k hands. Sustainable?
play where you're comfortable. you're obviously crushing this game. don't play 3/6 though, you seem to have the ability to dominate 5/10 alone
|
|
#25
05-16-2006, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.6 BB/100, 50k hands. Sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
Oh, and while you're at it, give us a graph where the 2/4, 3/6 and 5/10 stats are combined. I've seen your 3/6 graph, and it's equally sick. [/ QUOTE ] I have my hands spread over several databases. But here are my full ring hands 2/4-5/10 prior to moving to 6-max. Other than this, I have lost about 3k due to tilt/running bad at 10/20 (sometimes moving up when running bad). That was a while ago and wont happen again. [ QUOTE ] A serious question to OP: Do you even know what it's like to run bad? [/ QUOTE ] I've had some 200BBish swings and one 280-290ish (10/20 included). I don't think I've popped 300 yet. Does this count?  
|
|
#26
05-16-2006, 04:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.6 BB/100, 50k hands. Sustainable?
Jesus. This is better than porn. You and I are SO going to swap hand histories. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
(Yes, the 280 BB downer counts as a bad run...)
|
|
#27
05-16-2006, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 4.6 BB/100, 50k hands. Sustainable?
[ QUOTE ]
Jesus. This is better than porn. You and I are SO going to swap hand histories. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] (Yes, the 280 BB downer counts as a bad run...) [/ QUOTE ] Beware, there are 30k pacific hands (before it went crappy with the rake etc...) in the first graph. So it's better than it looks. Boy, did I use to love that place... [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
