Is SNGPT ever wrong? - Page 3

craigmarq · #21 01-13-2007, 02:42 AM

SO? its a marginal push at best risking elimination. Taking advantage of a .5% edge isn't really worth it most of the time.

XxGeneralxX · #22 01-13-2007, 02:58 AM

I agree that every +.000001% EV push does not need to be made..... fold and let the others duke it out.

Slim Pickens · #23 01-13-2007, 03:29 AM

[ QUOTE ]
SO? its a marginal push at best risking elimination. Taking advantage of a .5% edge isn't really worth it most of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are already accounting for "risking elimination" by having SNGPT use the ICM to calculate your prize pool equity.

DevinLake · #24 01-13-2007, 03:31 AM

[ QUOTE ]
SO? its a marginal push at best risking elimination. Taking advantage of a .5% edge isn't really worth it most of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Blah....0.5% is not a small edge and is almost always worth it.

That being said, SNGPT can never be wrong. It's asks you ranges, blinds, stacks, and your hand and pumps out a number based on ICM and payout structures. But, it cannot predict future events, or the accuracy of the information you gave it.

Like Ryan said, there is a lot of money to be gained in a spot like this simply by folding and letting the others go at it. SNGPT does not quantify that.

Also, as pudge alluded to, the BB is going to be on a huge range. My self, I'd be very very wide. Wider than 40% for sure.

craigmarq · #25 01-15-2007, 03:10 PM

Well, you guys are most likely right. I just got SNGPT a few days ago and I'm not an expert in applying it. However I think a fold here is way better than a push.