|
View Poll Results: When is the 75 going in? | |||
turn | 13 | 56.52% | |
river | 5 | 21.74% | |
It never/sometimes gets into the pot | 5 | 21.74% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
[ QUOTE ]
AA 971 times KK 882 QQ 929 JJ 785 1010 1032 Out of 84 thousand hands. My aces are winning 80% of the time but nothing else is winnign over 65% with kings being at 64 and queens at 61% [/ QUOTE ] Add me to the nonbeliever list. If these numbers were right, you'd be a big winner, not a whiner. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
OP,
You're suffering form what in the game theory world is known as over-optimization. In other words in certain games vs. multiple opponents, if all your opponents are playing very far from optimal, the standard multi player optimal game becomes a losing one. cliff notes: the tables are too fishy to beat |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
So you get T's+ 5.5% of your hands, and you don't win? You're doing it wrong!
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
[ QUOTE ]
but there is simply no way you got dealt this many big pairs unless its rigged [/ QUOTE ] fyp |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
I definitely don't think its rigged, but just FWIW my results approx. on all the sites I've played:
Party: +$175,000 FT: +$7500(just started playing there) Stars: -$30,000 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
Let's see some HHs to confirm this. Otherwise shut the [censored] up and go the [censored] away. Jesus Christ do you have any [censored] idea how sick and [censored] tired people are of these stupid [censored] retarded posts that do absolutely nothing to back up their ridiculous [censored] claims??????
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
[ QUOTE ]
AA 971 times KK 882 QQ 929 JJ 785 1010 1032 [/ QUOTE ] On average, you'll get each pocket pair 380 times over 84,000 hands. The standard deviation is 19.5. Getting aces 971 times is therefore a 30 standard deviation event. It is safe to say that you are either lying or that it wasn't 84,000 hands. Just to give you some idea of how unlikely a 30 SD event is, the likelihood of only a 7 SD event is 1 in 776 billion. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
[ QUOTE ]
Let's see some HHs to confirm this. Otherwise shut the [censored] up and go the [censored] away. Jesus Christ do you have any [censored] idea how sick and [censored] tired people are of these stupid [censored] retarded posts that do absolutely nothing to back up their ridiculous [censored] claims?????? [/ QUOTE ] You want him to provide HH's to prove +$182,500 -$30,000? For God's sake, Assani, if you do, just don't post them in a thread! |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
[ QUOTE ]
Let's see some HHs to confirm this. Otherwise shut the [censored] up and go the [censored] away. Jesus Christ do you have any [censored] idea how sick and [censored] tired people are of these stupid [censored] retarded posts that do absolutely nothing to back up their ridiculous [censored] claims?????? [/ QUOTE ] Usually I report posts like these, but goddammit I agree so much. Actually OnlinePro, it's been a while since you've posted one of your infamous "rigged" posts. I'm surprised you don't have a custom title yet. Oh yeah, FWIW (not that you'll believe me or some [censored]) I'm in the green at every level I've played at Pokerstars. And I've played Limit and NL there. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I cannot win on pokerstars. Reasons ??
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Let's see some HHs to confirm this. Otherwise shut the [censored] up and go the [censored] away. Jesus Christ do you have any [censored] idea how sick and [censored] tired people are of these stupid [censored] retarded posts that do absolutely nothing to back up their ridiculous [censored] claims?????? [/ QUOTE ] Usually I report posts like these, but goddammit I agree so much. Actually OnlinePro [/ QUOTE ] OnlinePro? His post was "Re: Assani". Even if you agree with the sentiment, the peppering of 'censored's all over the place makes the post look oafish, and all but unreadable. |
|
|