|
|
#21
10-26-2006, 01:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
[ QUOTE ]
We're getting 3.5:1 so we need to be good atleast 22% of the time here to call. I don't think we are. Unfortunately, True is incorrect here. Even though the villian shouldn't slowplay a set here, that doesn't mean that he wouldn't and didn't. The worst hand I can put villian on is KJs. I think this is a fold, and I would vomit a little right before I made it. [/ QUOTE ] You better save some vomit for when he shows the AA. 
|
|
#22
10-26-2006, 01:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
[ QUOTE ]
you never see QQ or TT here unless villain is completely retarded. True the argument is whether he plays AA/KK/JJ/AT like this enough to compensate for AK and AJ flush which I think he clearly does. [/ QUOTE ] Any real possible hand was played wrong though. My first thoughts were this is for sure AA/KK. But, title wording skewed my thoughts to Hero losing. AKs/TT are the only other hands that MAY make sense if he lost. I guess QQ too, but how do you not C/R that turn with QQ? EDIT: Just to be clear. I'm never folding this.
|
|
#27
10-26-2006, 02:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
True do you really have to repeat your name at the end of every post?
|
|
#29
10-26-2006, 02:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
I have to agree with True here that QQ/TT/77 are remote possibilities at best. Unless the villian is a complete donk, anyone who flopped a set on that board has to lead out with a bet. Villian in this instance checked the flop and, thus, is VERY unlikely to have one of the aforementioned hands.
|
|
#30
10-26-2006, 02:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: were deep, we know it, i suck, ill show it
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] True do you really have to repeat your name at the end of every post? [/ QUOTE ] signature. True [/ QUOTE ] Oh, it's his name. I thought he just felt the need to always attest to the veracity of his own statements.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
