#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
ya that was a really bad call with the one to a straight and the flush and a paired board. mine wasnt that good either but he did river me... you got to learn to play agaisnt the shorties... they are so juicy!
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
I know but sinsyn is a kind of shorty really unusual for me. I am still trying to find the range I should use to call his 3bet preflop. So far i'm going with 88+/AQ+. He is 3bing AI with at least AJo+/22+/A8s+ maybe some other random stuff. That's just that he gets lucky against me winning a flipcoin twice on other table and sucking out with pp vs lower pp. And as he has direct pos on me on a few tables I cannot raise light.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
[ QUOTE ]
the secret is that some of the regulars really sux [/ QUOTE ] Shhhhhh! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
Sinsyn is one of the worst style of short stackers I would say. Probably 99+ AQo+ is what I would use against what I have seen so far.
I think Party was actually very soft since the legislation. However, the Neteller thing appears to have brought back the Euro regulars from Tilt/Stars. I have asked SharkbitesDonk twice if he is Aloa - lol that you think this too. I was surprised Larry plays 1k - I didn't think he seemed so strong at 200NL, but not that many hands together. GreyButGreat is tight. Incidentally, you play well Jetset, I find you interesting to play against. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
so your complaining. about partypoker. cause its hard. klfjfknbafjladjfalfja;lsfklaskjldfjas;fjafj;lalf hyachachachahchachahcahchahcahcachachahchachahhahc ah
YOU ARE A CRUEL CRUEL MAN!!!!!!!!!!! |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
[ QUOTE ]
so your complaining. about partypoker. cause its hard. klfjfknbafjladjfalfja;lsfklaskjldfjas;fjafj;lalf hyachachachahchachahcahchahcahcachachahchachahhahc ah YOU ARE A CRUEL CRUEL MAN!!!!!!!!!!! [/ QUOTE ] yeah, its almost enough to get me to instaignore the person I miss party soooooo much |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
[ QUOTE ]
I didn't knew u were playing on PP, care to trade sn ? Okay mine is really easy [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I'll answer later (I am playing right) now and I'm really interested about your experience if you move to ft. By the way what do you call a decent wr ? [/ QUOTE ] PM'd you my sn. A decent WR post legislation should be 2.5-4? I used to beat the PP 200's for 5 bb/100 pre legislation. Now I am 12 tabling for around 1.3 bb/100. Pretty brutal. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
[ QUOTE ]
I cannot imagine in a million years that party poker is tighter than full tilt, I dont think its possible [/ QUOTE ] The full ring games are way worse then FT. I just finished up a session on FT and I had 12 tables running 25 vpip or higher. You rarely see even one table with 25 or higher on PP. The SH games on the other hand are way better on PP then PS or FT |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
[ QUOTE ]
so your complaining. about partypoker. cause its hard. klfjfknbafjladjfalfja;lsfklaskjldfjas;fjafj;lalf hyachachachahchachahcahchahcahcachachahchachahhahc ah YOU ARE A CRUEL CRUEL MAN!!!!!!!!!!! [/ QUOTE ] The old full ring tables on PP were awesome..don't get me wrong. I used to kill that game...now the full ring games are brutal...9 pm pacific time and there are 2 tables running. This sucks because I love the software and the VIP bonuses are pretty sweet. Also having RB doesn't hurt |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is anyone here beating the PP 200\'s for a decent rate?
I beat it for 3ptbb in December and Jan for 50k odd hands. Couldnt play in Feb, and have roared back into action with -8 buyins so far in March. GGrrrrr
|
|
|