|
|
#21
10-26-2006, 12:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: taylor vs bld
I've played w/ both bld is better, by lots.
To the idiot saying how h@ll is always up, ur wrong. He is def a huge winner but he doesnt crush like u think he does You guys need to realize how little results mean when you 1) aren't datamining and just looking at it w/ your own eyes (and thus the results arent really what u think they are) and 2) when it's ultra high stakes over a small sample size, the variance is out of control. 
|
|
#22
10-26-2006, 12:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
Somethin' tells me he can withstand the swings better now.
|
|
#23
10-26-2006, 12:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
fwiw I'm willing to bet that this game goes down within the next two weeks, probably sooner rather than later.
|
|
#24
10-26-2006, 01:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
[ QUOTE ]
BLD, why did you start playing 25/50? I thought you didnt like the added variance. Even if you are better than Halling, you can easily lose 50k/day if you are a tiny bit unlucky. [/ QUOTE ] He probably gave 25/50 a shot, ran hot and hasn't look back since ... haha.
|
|
#25
10-26-2006, 01:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw I'm willing to bet that this game goes down within the next two weeks, probably sooner rather than later. [/ QUOTE ] ??
|
|
#26
10-26-2006, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
[ QUOTE ]
To the idiot saying how h@ll is always up, ur wrong. He is def a huge winner but he doesnt crush like u think he does [/ QUOTE ] If you were referring to me, Ansky, then I apologise if I made a misalligned post. However, I never said he was "always up". I said he always has a "massive stack". Big difference. I just think he gets his multiple stacks up so big sometimes, that I'd find it very difficult to believe he's not as big a winner as some believe he is...even if he does lose a couple of buy-ins a day, he still manages, somehow, to get some huge stacks. Can you define "crush" if it doesn't allign closely with being a "huge winner". Are they not very close to being one and the same thing? You're saying he's a huge winner but he doesn't crush the game? Apologies if I'm being pedantic but I simply don't get it. Are you saying there's being a huge winner and then there's crushing a game above that? I've always maintained that there are probably better players out there. In fact I know there are. I just think he gets quite a lot of criticism for being one of the most successful (not best, but successful) players on the net. He's got to be doing something right, no? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#27
10-26-2006, 01:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
He's the Stars Battle Royale. Heh.
|
|
#28
10-26-2006, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw I'm willing to bet that this game goes down within the next two weeks, probably sooner rather than later. [/ QUOTE ] ??
|
|
#29
10-26-2006, 01:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
LOL have you guys actually watched the HU matches btw Hall and Bld? Bld has been getting such a cold deck and so UL its unbelivable. Hall is prob. up like 50k vs him this week but really means nothing in the long run.
|
|
#30
10-26-2006, 02:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: taylor vs bld
[ QUOTE ]
BLD, why did you start playing 25/50? I thought you didnt like the added variance. Even if you are better than Halling, you can easily lose 50k/day if you are a tiny bit unlucky. [/ QUOTE ] well this might have something to do with it [ QUOTE ] Was up 600 my last 5 weeks. I was coming into my own and then this happens. [/ QUOTE ] his results right before the bill passed
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
