Important, yet often ignored strategy question

[Admo]

At last year's WSOP I registered for 4-5 tournaments the first day I arrived in Vegas, which was the day before Event #2.

My seat was in the first few tourney tables for every one of those events.

[Goldmund]

[ QUOTE ]
Obviously, the goal is to end up with as many satellite players and other complete donks at your table as possible

[/ QUOTE ]

How more stupidly arrogant can you get than referring to satellite players as a group as complete donks? Check how many of the majors are won by tough players that satellited their way in, "hotshot".

[Goldmund]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I know different places use different algorithms.

[/ QUOTE ]

You might wanna check the meaning of the word algorithm in the dictionary.

[timex]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously, the goal is to end up with as many satellite players and other complete donks at your table as possible

[/ QUOTE ]

How more stupidly arrogant can you get than referring to satellite players as a group as complete donks? Check how many of the majors are won by tough players that satellited their way in, "hotshot".

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point, I will not be playing the Sunday Million or the WSOP because these satellite players have me outclassed.

[Goldmund]

What exactly is your point Timex?


[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously, the goal is to end up with as many satellite players and other complete donks at your table as possible

[/ QUOTE ]

How more stupidly arrogant can you get than referring to satellite players as a group as complete donks? Check how many of the majors are won by tough players that satellited their way in, "hotshot".

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point, I will not be playing the Sunday Million or the WSOP because these satellite players have me outclassed.

[/ QUOTE ]

[BigAlK]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously, the goal is to end up with as many satellite players and other complete donks at your table as possible

[/ QUOTE ]

How more stupidly arrogant can you get than referring to satellite players as a group as complete donks? Check how many of the majors are won by tough players that satellited their way in, "hotshot".

[/ QUOTE ]

Arrogant, sure. Who cares. But you can't possibly think a table made up of mostly satelite qualifiers can be as tough as a table made up of direct buy-ins/pros. I'm often one of those sat qualifiers in bigger (for me) tournaments and I'm, if not a complete donk, at least a partial one. It's all realitve. I don't think the way OP worded it he's saying all sat qualifiers were donks. He just reasonably expects some complete donks and a generally softer table than he'd get at a table of direct buy-ins.

[ZeeJustin]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously, the goal is to end up with as many satellite players and other complete donks at your table as possible

[/ QUOTE ]

How more stupidly arrogant can you get than referring to satellite players as a group as complete donks? Check how many of the majors are won by tough players that satellited their way in, "hotshot".

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Doesn't even need a response really. Just LOL.

[Goldmund]

Not the first time you show to be an arrogant, annoying, ignorant little dwarf.

[mastr]

people love being hateful when they have no one to answer to due to the anonymity of the internets. Grow up man.

[Pudge714]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Obviously, the goal is to end up with as many satellite players and other complete donks at your table as possible

[/ QUOTE ]

How more stupidly arrogant can you get than referring to satellite players as a group as complete donks? Check how many of the majors are won by tough players that satellited their way in, "hotshot".

[/ QUOTE ]
If you don't get that the average direct buy-in player is better than the average player who sats in you are retarded.