#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
wtf fold, cmon.. shoving is absolutely horrendous..
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
This thread made my head hurt.....Please fold your hand.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
I'd be ok w/ folding or calling
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
He could have QJs+ and 88+ here. Usually that many callers = lots of suited connectors and small pairs. I'd shove over him. TT against a 30/23's 4 handed reraising range is like 60/40.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
[ QUOTE ]
He could have QJs+ and 88+ here. Usually that many callers = lots of suited connectors and small pairs. I'd shove over him. TT against a 30/23's 4 handed reraising range is like 60/40. [/ QUOTE ] ahah as if he EVER has 99/88/77/66/55/qjs/etc. Those hands are wayyyyyyyy too good to turn into a bluff given his relative position to the pfr and excellent pot odds to call. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
I'd just fold.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
Shoving here is absolutely brutal. Set mining here is also nonsense, that's a pretty big raise to call for and there's no guarantee that the others will call that big raise.
I would fold this unless I know the player well enough to pull a squeeze here. But most times in this spot it looks like a value raise than anything else. Against unknown, fold. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
Fold is fine.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
What a bunch of morons
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10 1010 vs an \"obvious\" squeeze?
call, obviously
|
|
|