#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV Please to be helping solve this staking arguement free 10$
If there is no makeup than there would be no payment and up to Player A if he even wants to split the shares.
And again, like you are saying over the long run neither staker should care because they will get positive eventually. If staker B doesn't wanna pay the makeup up front and still wants in on the deal then the 1400 makeup should be the priority before B makes any money. However, he obviously can avoid this by paying 1/2 of it up front. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV Please to be helping solve this staking arguement free 10$
This thread hurts my head.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV Please to be helping solve this staking arguement free 10$
I agree with Staker B buying 50% of the makeup and going from there, or work on a sliding scale of makeup purchase.
Such as B buys 25% of the makeup and gets 75/25 until makeup is completely repaid. Or if he wants no part of the makeup then you are looking at something like a 90/10 deal. I really think buying in for half of the makeup is the best solution. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV Please to be helping solve this staking arguement free 10$
more heads up grudge matches vs aejones pls
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BBV Please to be helping solve this staking arguement free 10$
you are younghov
|
|
|