Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:31 PM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

[ QUOTE ]
His point is not that every card that comes will make a straight possible, but simply that if there is an A on the board, there is always AT LEAST ONE CARD that will make a straight on the turn. You can never guarantee that your opponent will not make a straight.

And yes, it's true, but not particularly meaningful. It would probably have been better to point out flops where it's impossible for the turn to bring a straight.

[/ QUOTE ]

If that's what Brunson meant, it's kinda useless info.
There's 284 ways for ABC type flop.
220 ways for ABC type flop with no ace.
Only four ways out of the 220 is it not
possible to have a turn straight threat card.
K83, K82, K72, and Q72.
If you're worried about unlikely turn straights,
you're to...o paranoid for this game.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-23-2007, 03:50 PM
iplayscared iplayscared is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 294
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

this thread is retarded
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:32 AM
mecbluefugate mecbluefugate is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 179
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

[ QUOTE ]
I agree that the Ace observation is true, but not very useful. It's misleading in the sense you mention, a better statement is a straight possibility is 100% certain with an unpaired flop unless the flop is 2, 7, Q; 2, 7, K; 2, 8, K; or 3, 8, K.

Sure an A guarantees a straight possibility, but so does 4, 5, 6, 9, T or J. And even if flop consists only of 2, 3, 7, 8, Q and K, there's a 75% chance of a straight possiblity.

It's not a bad pedagogical point for getting people to think about how many straight possibilities there are, and how dangerous free cards can be. But it's a bad point in that it can misleading about the situation without an Ace.

As a practical matter, you don't worry too much about straights that require someone to hold 63 and hit an inside card on the turn. You worry a lot more if the flop contains JT because KQ is a hand that will likely see the flop, and an open-ended high straight is a likely draw.

[/ QUOTE ]


the reason he talked about the ace thing is because he was talking about why he doesnt ever slowplay a set of aces
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-24-2007, 10:23 AM
Nybble Nybble is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 11
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
here is something an old timer told me that i figured out was wrong. "In holdem, you can make every straight with a Ten Five" . this is incorrect. DUCY?

[/ QUOTE ]

no 9high straight
btw fu for beeing a smartass

[/ QUOTE ]

5-6-7-8-9

unless you are playing with 4 cards?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-24-2007, 10:41 AM
RustyBrooks RustyBrooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,380
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
here is something an old timer told me that i figured out was wrong. "In holdem, you can make every straight with a Ten Five" . this is incorrect. DUCY?

[/ QUOTE ]

no 9high straight
btw fu for beeing a smartass

[/ QUOTE ]

5-6-7-8-9

unless you are playing with 4 cards?

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? How about that T of yours? 6-7-8-9-T
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-24-2007, 01:47 PM
HonestRyan HonestRyan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bloggin and Ballin
Posts: 183
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

[ QUOTE ]
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

here is something an old timer told me that i figured out was wrong. "In holdem, you can make every straight with a Ten Five" . this is incorrect. DUCY?



no 9high straight
btw fu for beeing a smartass



5-6-7-8-9

unless you are playing with 4 cards?



Really? How about that T of yours? 6-7-8-9-T

[/ QUOTE ]


LOL! bingo right on the money. a T 5 can make every straight except for a 9 high straight. u guys crack me up.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-24-2007, 02:33 PM
Gonso Gonso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: seat zero
Posts: 3,265
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

The correct saying is, "a straight is impossible without a T or 5".
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-24-2007, 05:05 PM
Yads Yads is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,516
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

[ QUOTE ]
It's just one of his rules(or better a guideline).
But it isn't always right.

AT5 flop.
6,7,8, and 9 does not make a straight.

A95 flop.
K,Q,J, and T does not make a straight.

[/ QUOTE ]

In both of your examples a 2, 3, or 4 make a wheel. Also in the first example a J, Q, or K makes broadway.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-25-2007, 08:08 AM
hra146 hra146 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam, bitches
Posts: 4,041
Default Re: Doyle Brunson is wrong about straights and free cards

read =/=> post
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.