#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat : 172K hands, 3K profit
he "won" ~7k, of which 4k was raked, leaving him ~3k profit
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat : 172K hands, 3K profit
[ QUOTE ]
$1700 profit and 60k hands at NL25 before you moved up to NL50? Thats a NL100 bankroll. [/ QUOTE ] I moved up way before hitting 60K hands at NL25. But as you can see my winrate at NL50 kinda sucks, and I moved back down several times because I can't deal with variance. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat : 172K hands, 3K profit
[ QUOTE ]
that is depressing because we have very similar lines. [/ QUOTE ] that is depressing because we have very similar lines/amount of hands played and small profits made [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat : 172K hands, 3K profit
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] that is depressing because we have very similar lines. [/ QUOTE ] that is depressing because we have very similar lines/amount of hands played and small profits made [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] he ran awful at 50NL (or he just sucks) for 60k hands, that's the real beat in his post |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat : 172K hands, 3K profit
its a pretty sick graph if you just add a few zeros to the numbers on the left?
|
|
|