#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yeah i really disagree with check calling here [/ QUOTE ] oh cool thanks for your opinions on the hand checking calling makes more sense than people think [/ QUOTE ] which unpaired hands is he calling with tho? AX is a no. is he calling a 4bet with QK or 65s stuff? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
maybe? the original post sucks at describing how they have been playing with each other, so i cant answer that.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] part 3 is the part i don't understand, but w/e. depends on how often you think he checks behind and how often he shows up with unpaired trashy things that are trying to outrace AK. i think neither thing happens enough. [/ QUOTE ] thing is the 4bet is only 80 more. i just dont see him folding much there, so his range is closer to his overall 3betting range. so, i actually think OP has the best hand enough to warrant not folding. agree he never has AK btw* [/ QUOTE ] it's utg vs co. if you are calling super light against a utg 4 bet, you are spewing money. c/c on this flop is not very good. it'd have merit on a co vs button battle or blind battle. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
[ QUOTE ]
i kinda like check calling [/ QUOTE ] |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i kinda like check calling [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] at least give a reason jesus |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
dont commit over a quater of ur stsk pre, just go all in.......hand becomes simple
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i kinda like check calling [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] w/o some history or read that poly is calling this 4 bet light a decent amount this sucks however it still has more merit than shoving IMO. [ QUOTE ] dont commit over a quater of ur stsk pre, just go all in.......hand becomes simple [/ QUOTE ] this comment is just completely ridiculous. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i kinda like check calling [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] at least give a reason jesus [/ QUOTE ] we are getting 2:1 on our call, we sometimes win, better chance of getting it in vs AQ/AJ or whatever this way. this all assumes that the two players have played a few 4bet pots before etc etc |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
c/f. future doc is right, all types of villians call here w/ any pair.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 4bet pot against poly_baller
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i kinda like check calling [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] at least give a reason jesus [/ QUOTE ] we are getting 2:1 on our call, we sometimes win, better chance of getting it in vs AQ/AJ or whatever this way. this all assumes that the two players have played a few 4bet pots before etc etc [/ QUOTE ] Granted my view may be skewed b/c I have a LOT of history w/ Poly, but I actually think we have a better chance of getting in vs his AQ/AJ if we shove here than if we c/c. I don't know how the game was playing or what history the 2 of you have, but if he did call the 4 bet w/ AQ or AJ, it was not w/ the intention of folding. I'm not saying shove is the right play either, I'm just saying it's got a better chance of getting in vs his AQ or AJ than c/c does. |
|
|