#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dr. Bob
[ QUOTE ]
As mentioned repeatedly, that's his win% for 3 years, because he wants you to ignore his bad years before that because he 'changed his models' so bad years aren't counted anymore LDO. 240 games is not a long-term sample size, earlier results need to be included DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] As a matter of contention. I'm far ahead of his ROI over a larger sample size. I'm stunned my fan base isn't as large as his. My marketing department needs to be contacted. As an aside. There will be a post to follow about why my results aren't statistically significant and I expect to regress to high single digits. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dr. Bob
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As mentioned repeatedly, that's his win% for 3 years, because he wants you to ignore his bad years before that because he 'changed his models' so bad years aren't counted anymore LDO. 240 games is not a long-term sample size, earlier results need to be included DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] As a matter of contention. I'm far ahead of his ROI over a larger sample size. I'm stunned my fan base isn't as large as his. My marketing department needs to be contacted. As an aside. There will be a post to follow about why my results aren't statistically significant and I expect to regress to high single digits. [/ QUOTE ] FWIW I am running at 10% this year over ~250 bets and 6% over the last 2 years over ~700 bets. Not large samples I know. [/brag] |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dr. Bob
Drbob is 55.2% winners since 2003 according to his website, [drops to 51.6% if you ignore 2005 results.] After a 3-1 week, he is 25-28-1 this year. Of course, 55.2% is still good. Note: DrBob is running behind the purely mechanical CBB system's winrate LDO. |
|
|