Are you hitting your sets?

[Eggpie]

no, the nearer the blue is to the middle the nearer you are to the average amount of sets you'd expect. However with any sample you are going to vary.
If your blue is very small and you have had a bad streak money wise, this could be the explanation. However if you're hitting more than your fair share of sets and still losing in money stakes, then there are likely to be leaks in your game.

The other aspects are the KK vs AA ones and sets vs sets/overpairs, where it is pretty unavoidable. If you've lost money you should look here before looking for leaks.

[Civi]

Isn't that what I said? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] The graph is to do with how many times I flopped a set.

Pairs dealt - Flops seen - Flopped a set

[Poker monkey]

[ QUOTE ]

AA has the lowest set:flop ratio (by quite a bit, too - 14:1 against)

[/ QUOTE ]You might expect this - you're more likely to see a flop when the remaining Aces have been dealt to other players, so you're less likely to flop a set with Aces. Not sure how big this effect is.

[jhill3535]

I just flopped a set of 6's 3 times in the last hour and won stacks with all 3.....yippeeeee

[TwoNitty]

~50k hands


I hope that's not too big. Anyway...FU 44.

[roll]

This thread is a joke. I haven't flopped a set in 3 days..

son of a god damn mother [censored] [censored] sucking why the [censored] does that happen every god damn mother [censored] time?????

[five4suited]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

AA has the lowest set:flop ratio (by quite a bit, too - 14:1 against)

[/ QUOTE ]You might expect this - you're more likely to see a flop when the remaining Aces have been dealt to other players, so you're less likely to flop a set with Aces. Not sure how big this effect is.

[/ QUOTE ]

excellent point.

re the op: I don't even want to know where I fall on the setometer, because of the tilt-inducing possibilities. I will say, however, that I've been wondering for a little while now whether the algorithm is configured to deal a set using the odds of whether you'll get there by the river (4.21:1).

[chicken10der]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

AA has the lowest set:flop ratio (by quite a bit, too - 14:1 against)

[/ QUOTE ]You might expect this - you're more likely to see a flop when the remaining Aces have been dealt to other players, so you're less likely to flop a set with Aces. Not sure how big this effect is.

[/ QUOTE ]

This logic is incorrect. Even if any other A always calls and any other 5 always folds, then there will be the exact same number of dead aces and dead fives when AA or 55 respectively see a flop (in a perfectly normal distribution).

[jhill3535]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

AA has the lowest set:flop ratio (by quite a bit, too - 14:1 against)

[/ QUOTE ]You might expect this - you're more likely to see a flop when the remaining Aces have been dealt to other players, so you're less likely to flop a set with Aces. Not sure how big this effect is.

[/ QUOTE ]

This logic is incorrect. Even if any other A always calls and any other 5 always folds, then there will be the exact same number of dead aces and dead fives when AA or 55 respectively see a flop (in a perfectly normal distribution).

[/ QUOTE ]

Now it is normal to flop more sets with AA-JJ than 55-22 bc you usually see more flops with AA-JJ than you do with 55-22

[Johnes Benjamin]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

AA has the lowest set:flop ratio (by quite a bit, too - 14:1 against)

[/ QUOTE ]You might expect this - you're more likely to see a flop when the remaining Aces have been dealt to other players, so you're less likely to flop a set with Aces. Not sure how big this effect is.

[/ QUOTE ]

This logic is incorrect. Even if any other A always calls and any other 5 always folds, then there will be the exact same number of dead aces and dead fives when AA or 55 respectively see a flop (in a perfectly normal distribution).

[/ QUOTE ]

Now it is normal to flop more sets with AA-JJ than 55-22 bc you usually see more flops with AA-JJ than you do with 55-22

[/ QUOTE ]

More, but not a higher %