Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-29-2007, 05:27 PM
AAismyfriend AAismyfriend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Valuestacking myself
Posts: 2,907
Default Re: Nl600: AQs

if you insist on doing this just shove the flop
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-29-2007, 05:29 PM
EgoSlasher EgoSlasher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 961
Default Re: Nl600: AQs

[ QUOTE ]
Wtf at this being terrible. Villain has a hand here like close to never and I dont want to let him suckout. Raising here is totally standard although we dont necessarily have to puah.

[/ QUOTE ]


Why do you think you're folding out pairs vs this 40/20?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-29-2007, 05:33 PM
poker1O1 poker1O1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: sitting here in ventrilo
Posts: 2,321
Default Re: Nl600: AQs

[ QUOTE ]
if you insist on doing this just shove the flop

[/ QUOTE ]
agreed. This isn't a flop where you wanna price him in. open shove seems fine imo.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-29-2007, 05:38 PM
MATT111 MATT111 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Driving sideways on a one way street
Posts: 3,066
Default Re: Nl600: AQs

I just saw I misread the hand. I thought we had position and he donks into us. This changes things as we are behind a lot more whwn he bets like this. Checking to induce a bluff looks good. Now that he bet so small a call is probably in order although we`ll get into tough spots a lot so yea - i still like a raise.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-29-2007, 05:43 PM
Gorilla Boy Gorilla Boy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 130
Default Re: Nl600: AQs

MH,

What about sets and 44/66 in villan's range? That would swing it so he has to fold some of the time for +0EV. Im saying this is close to breakeven play, but good for meta game!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-29-2007, 06:45 PM
linuxrocks linuxrocks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,014
Default Re: Nl600: AQs

[ QUOTE ]
Thought this was a difficult spot, so I decided to run the numbers on this one and got some interesting results.

Pot Size after villain bets: 333 + 78 = 411
Left to Shove: 433.8 - 105 = 328.8 (effective stacks of 433.8)
Final Pot Size if Villain Calls: 333 + 328.8*2 = 990.6

Equity when called*:
*The range will vary a lot on the donk, but in general we will always have around 35% equity with the overcards, bdfd, and gutshot.

Board: 2c 5d 3h
Dead:

Hand 0: 35.842% { AdQd }
Hand 1: 64.158% { AcAs, AdAs, KcKs, KdKs, JJ-77, 55, 65s }

Let X = probability villain folds.

EV of Shove is neutral when:
0 = 411(X) + (1-X)(990.6*0.35 - 328.8)
X = -5%.

So villain never has to fold for this to be +EV! A couple more numbers:
X = 0%, EV = 17.91
X = 10%, EV = 57.22
X = 20%, EV = 96.53

So, not a terrible play at all. Nice hand hero!

[/ QUOTE ]

This is some wishful thinking. There are some hands that you left out that may call. IMO, this guy is never folding here with his stack. Let's see the numbers

<font color="blue">Results from http:\\www.HoldEmRanger.com
83,160 evaluations, 84 hole card combos

Board: 2c 5d 3h

Wins Ties Equity
24.17% 2.83% 27.01% ( AdQd )
70.16% 2.83% 72.99% ( AA-22,A4,A5 ) </font>

0 = 411(X) + (1-X)(990.6*0.25 - 328.8) <font color="red">X = 16%</font>.

If I remove A4 and A5,

<font color="blue">Wins Ties Equity
29.18% 1.46% 30.64% ( AdQd )
67.91% 1.46% 69.36% ( AA-22 ) </font>

0 = 411(X) + (1-X)(990.6*0.3 - 328.8) <font color="red">X = 7%</font>.

So, if the guy is never folding (which is mostly true considering he is committed), this is clearly -EV. If you really wanted to do this, like some one said, better push the flop simply.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-29-2007, 07:51 PM
donkeykong2 donkeykong2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 970
Default Re: Nl600: AQs

i can never see folding here with this stack sizes and i dont see why he can never fold after leading that weak. he wont do it often though. other option would be to call after his bet was so small, i dont see how this can be good though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.