|
|
#21
10-07-2007, 09:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Harrington on cash
Well then it looks like I'm definitely buying it then.
|
|
#22
10-07-2007, 02:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington on cash
[ QUOTE ]
How good is Harrington in cash games? I never even knew he was really good at cash. Thought he only really did tournaments. [/ QUOTE ] He was playing cash games long before he ever began playing tournaments.
|
|
#23
10-07-2007, 03:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington on cash
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How good is Harrington in cash games? I never even knew he was really good at cash. Thought he only really did tournaments. [/ QUOTE ] He was playing cash games long before he ever began playing tournaments. [/ QUOTE ] As mentioned in Volume 1 of his tournament book, he also played both cash and tournament backgammon at the highest level before he switched to poker. He states that the differences needed in aggressiveness, between cash and tournaments, are similar in both games.
|
|
#24
10-07-2007, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Harrington on cash
[ QUOTE ]
Thank you, Mason. Yeah, I know it's not an exact science. I'm not whining or impatient,just wanted to know where it was "at". My wife is a language arts / reading teacher so I'm going to get hit for that senetnce ending "at" [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] The rule of not ending a sentence with a preposition was invented by a 18th century English pedant who spent most of his time sitting over a desk and inventing "rules" for English writing. There is no logical reason why we can't end a sentence with a preposition, other than for reasons of eloquence, something not all the time necessary on 2p2. Tell your wife that [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
