|
|
#21
09-28-2007, 11:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I can beat NL $2
Worthless with graphs.
|
|
#23
09-29-2007, 12:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I can beat NL $2
[ QUOTE ]
Grinding it out for $2.20 a day for 22 days straight.... that must be a slow and painful process. WHY? Work a crappy job for a couple of days and you are rolled for 25NL. My idea of rebuilding a roll after expenses is putting a few hundreds on a site and start grinding out at 50NL. I mean, nobody can be that busto that they can't afford a few hundred dollars, can they? [/ QUOTE ] that's briliant, depositing 6 buy-ins
|
|
#24
09-29-2007, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I can beat NL $2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] hahaha your loc. is "lagtard" but u play 2NL [/ QUOTE ] Hahaha how does my bankroll have anything to do with how I play? Someone want to stake me HU vs this guy. I can post my HU results if you would like. I've played up through NL $200 HU. I had to withdraw my roll for college sorry for having expenses. [/ QUOTE ] lets go fish i'll play you...stars or FT? HU4Rollz?
|
|
#26
09-29-2007, 09:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I can beat NL $2
[ QUOTE ]
i would rather put my hand in a blender than play 2k hands at 2NL DUCY [/ QUOTE ]This is an example of a poor use of DUCY. Because of course we CY, it is obvious.
|
|
#27
09-29-2007, 09:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I can beat NL $2
Personally, I don't see why anyone would rather lose their hand in a horrific accident then be mildly bored for 4 hours. I mean, it just doesn't make sense; you couldn't even have your hand surgically reattached, since it will have been blended to a uniform pureé. This is a very serious bit of business, which you would have to live with, forever.
Oh, I get it. The blender doesn't have to be plugged in. Yes, that is rather obvious.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
