|
|
#22
10-05-2007, 01:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 109r 6 max BvB v. Shaundeeb Calling ranges?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] screenname is kind of relevant here... If you're an unknown this is a fistpump snap call, if he knows you're a decent player it's only a snap call. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] oh how i miss sngs. snapcall against anyone here. 
|
|
#23
10-05-2007, 03:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109r 6 max BvB v. Shaundeeb Calling ranges?
Shaun,
I'm not the best w/ the pf math stuff, but I've gotten pretty good over the years. If I had to guess, I'd say that if calling w/ K7s here is wrong vs you, then you are playing really badly from the sb.
|
|
#25
10-05-2007, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109r 6 max BvB v. Shaundeeb Calling ranges?
I'm also not sure if you should be taking a neutral ev spot here. Push/calling in sngs is so much easier because ICM does a much better job of estimating your equity.
djk, You might be able to shove profitably without looking at your cards, but the hands at the bottom of your shoving range can still be -EV. If I'm shoving TT+ AK, 23s. It will be +EV, but obv shoving TT+ AK will be more +EV.
|
|
#26
10-05-2007, 06:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109r 6 max BvB v. Shaundeeb Calling ranges?
[ QUOTE ]
I'm also not sure if you should be taking a neutral ev spot here. Push/calling in sngs is so much easier because ICM does a much better job of estimating your equity. djk, You might be able to shove profitably without looking at your cards, but the hands at the bottom of your shoving range can still be -EV. If I'm shoving TT+ AK, 23s. It will be +EV, but obv shoving TT+ AK will be more +EV. [/ QUOTE ] yea i realized i did that wrong but cudnt edit it out
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
