#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
sorry double post
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
not at all trying to hijack this thread but some of you are referring to actnjunkie as "SHE"...who is she?? just curious....
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
"not at all trying to hijack this thread but some of you are referring to actnjunkie as "SHE"...who is she?? just curious.... "
Brandi? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
Since its common knowledge its Chantel.
-DeathDonkey |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
Oh, right. I couldn't remember which one.
Thanks, Bill |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] not if she pays off with K high and that is the majority of her range... [/ QUOTE ] hmmm, i just stoved it. Still think you lose money on the bet, but it's closer than i'd originally thought. If she occasionally bluffs k-hi when checked to, then i guess betting is ok. [/ QUOTE ] Combo of: 1) Weight it more heavily towards K-high than ace high since most of the reasonably big aces she'll cap preflop against me. 2) Betting takes away me having to make a decision if I check and she bets. You can never be too certain if it's a 0% or 5% or 20% likelihood she'll bet a K-high on the river. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
[ QUOTE ]
Since its common knowledge its Chantel. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] I'm under impression various people play on it these days. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
I thought PS had a policy against account sharing ? Didn't they ban some accounts for that reason ?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
not that I'm aware of.
Letting somebody else play on your account is evidently okay I think. YOU have more than one account of your own is not allowed though. I believe they have specifically said that they allow letting others play on your account because there really isn't anything they can do to prevent it. My memory might be off about this one though. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
[ QUOTE ]
not that I'm aware of. Letting somebody else play on your account is evidently okay I think. YOU have more than one account of your own is not allowed though. I believe they have specifically said that they allow letting others play on your account because there really isn't anything they can do to prevent it. My memory might be off about this one though. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I believe this was settled by the Great Monkey Email some time back. PokerStars indicated that they could not be held responsible for players letting loose-aggressive pet monkeys play on the players' accounts. SpaceAce |
|
|