|
|
#22
10-04-2007, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Chess Players?
8)Kxf7+ (Sorry, I thought I posted this already, whoops)
|
|
#23
10-06-2007, 01:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chess Players?
Oops, sorry. I play on a couple correspondence servers and got the games mixed up. Thanks for the PM pyramid. I resign. God, I should have looked at a board before that last move, I'm really not retarded, just thought I had already played Nf6. Gg.
1-0
|
|
#24
10-06-2007, 02:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chess Players?
Swingdoc, don't you think a resignation here is a LITTLE hasty? You're only down in position and I have no clear win.
Also in all correspondance chess youre allowed to use books/databases just not AI's or other people, so a game never needs to be lost in the opening [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
|
#25
10-06-2007, 02:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chess Players?
[ QUOTE ]
Swingdoc, don't you think a resignation here is a LITTLE hasty? You're only down in position and I have no clear win. [/ QUOTE ] Nope. I've analyzed the hell out of this position when I played the SM gambit with white and it's practically a forced win for white if he knows what he's doing. +3 or something when I analyzed it a year ago with rybka. [ QUOTE ] Also in all correspondance chess youre allowed to use books/databases just not AI's or other people, so a game never needs to be lost in the opening [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I'm sure you're just trying to be helpful here, but this comes off as awfully condescending.
|
|
#26
10-06-2007, 03:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chess Players?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Swingdoc, don't you think a resignation here is a LITTLE hasty? You're only down in position and I have no clear win. [/ QUOTE ] Nope. I've analyzed the hell out of this position when I played the SM gambit with white and it's practically a forced win for white if he knows what he's doing. +3 or something when I analyzed it a year ago with rybka. [ QUOTE ] Also in all correspondance chess youre allowed to use books/databases just not AI's or other people, so a game never needs to be lost in the opening [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I'm sure you're just trying to be helpful here, but this comes off as awfully condescending. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, but I figured a disaster in the opening meant you weren't doing this, a lot of people think it's 'cheating' I wouldn't take it as condescending because obviously you know more than me, I don't see the forced win [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I actually thought after move 6 or so you were knew what you were doing and I probably SHOULD NOT have opened with the Smith-Morra Gambit, because it only works on idiots. I'm probably fortunate you were careless.
|
|
#27
10-06-2007, 03:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Chess Players?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Also in all correspondance chess youre allowed to use books/databases just not AI's or other people, so a game never needs to be lost in the opening [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I'm sure you're just trying to be helpful here, but this comes off as awfully condescending. [/ QUOTE ] in fairness he can easily think you are beginner or close (before this post). If you started a game with almost anyone else on the forum I wouldn't expect them to have access to a database, never mind use one.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
