Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-15-2007, 11:46 AM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: k Tight
Posts: 2,339
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

Hi KRANTZ,

The only bluff component I see to hand one is an attempt to push you off a chop sometimes. He knows he's ahead very often on the river, and when he's not, he's usually tied.

Hand 2 I see no bluff aspect to; in what world would you or anyone fold KK+ on the river? This is a pretty excellent card for him.

If the main hand being discussed relates to the above hands, he can be value betting any Q. I don't see him bluffing here, because there are few hands you likely hold that aren't too good to bluff out right now. Maybe 99, 88, etc., but 7s are now trips, and Qs are not folding. The only way you'd show up with something very weak here is if you floated the flop and picked up a draw, and I have no idea if you were doing stuff like that with KJ/As8s or whatever, but that seems unlikely as well. So the question IMO is, how much of his range is comprised of Qs that chop with you. You get half the pot there, and most of his range beyond that is beating you (very little air IMO, very little v-betting from a random pair of tens), so you have to do the math. Off the top of my head, this seems like a close call.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-15-2007, 11:50 AM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway (London currently)
Posts: 5,040
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

Queens that chop is QJ exactly..
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-15-2007, 12:57 PM
KRANTZ KRANTZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the 1980s
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

i don't know if this will add anything to discussion, but we also played this reraised pot a bit earlier where he was bluffing:

POKERSTARS GAME #9409782444: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($25/$50) - 2007/04/13 - 23:22:00 (ET)
Table 'Veritas' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 4: Hold_emNL ($7145 in chips)
Seat 5: purplEUROS ($5674 in chips)
purplEUROS: posts small blind $25
Hold_emNL: posts big blind $50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to purplEUROS [6c Tc]
purplEUROS: raises $100 to $150
Hold_emNL: raises $400 to $550
purplEUROS: calls $400
*** FLOP *** [6d Kc 6s]
Hold_emNL: bets $850
purplEUROS: calls $850
*** TURN *** [6d Kc 6s] [8s]
Hold_emNL: bets $5745 and is all-in
purplEUROS: calls $4274 and is all-in
*** RIVER *** [6d Kc 6s 8s] [Qc]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Hold_emNL: shows [3s As] (a pair of Sixes)
purplEUROS: shows [6c Tc] (three of a kind, Sixes)
purplEUROS collected $11347 from pot
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-15-2007, 05:12 PM
coxquinn coxquinn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Making Aggressive Calls
Posts: 1,012
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

this brag isn't thin or veiled
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-15-2007, 08:26 PM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: k Tight
Posts: 2,339
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

[ QUOTE ]
Queens that chop is QJ exactly..

[/ QUOTE ]

Right. I forgot that durrr isn't allowed to reraise pre-flop with rag Qs.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-15-2007, 08:43 PM
Melchiades Melchiades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Norway (London currently)
Posts: 5,040
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

Misunderstood your post.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-15-2007, 09:12 PM
cero_z cero_z is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: k Tight
Posts: 2,339
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

[ QUOTE ]
Misunderstood your post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah. I see now that I wasn't that clear. My bad.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-15-2007, 10:04 PM
fatgirl_lover fatgirl_lover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 295
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

the decision is on the turn. there are a lot of bad cards that can come on the river so if a complete rag come off and you have a tough decision it's bad news bears. then again v. a player like durr it could be more likely he has a hand now, and a flush card could be a better call to call the river bet on, depends what level you guys are playing on. to me, this looks like a straight forward value bet by durr including hands QK and better.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:14 AM
TxRedMan TxRedMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ty [censored] Cobb
Posts: 4,865
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

I think you should raise the flop, but meh.

As played, I can't see you being ahead here often enough to call.

Also, why are you playing durrr HU?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-16-2007, 01:15 AM
Phresh Phresh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I Like Toffifay.
Posts: 3,475
Default Re: hand vs durrrr, top pair deep HU

[ QUOTE ]
Also, why are you playing durrr HU?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because he doesn't think he has an edge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.