#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
wow
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads??? *DELETED*
Post deleted by Mike Haven
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
whose lawyers?
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
whose lawyers? [/ QUOTE ] It is irrelevant, DUCY? J |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] whose lawyers? [/ QUOTE ] It is irrelevant, DUCY? J [/ QUOTE ] yeah, I do, but I want to know how the process unfolded. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] whose lawyers? [/ QUOTE ] It is irrelevant, DUCY? J [/ QUOTE ] yeah, I do, but I want to know how the process unfolded. [/ QUOTE ] A letter was sent, a Malmuth or a Sklansky wet himself, and the post vanished. J |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] whose lawyers? [/ QUOTE ] It is irrelevant, DUCY? J [/ QUOTE ] yeah, I do, but I want to know how the process unfolded. [/ QUOTE ] A letter was sent, a Malmuth or a Sklansky wet himself, and the post vanished. J [/ QUOTE ] So when is the letter from AP coming? Over/Under? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
I still don't understand what they could have threatened 2+2 with. What would 2+2 have been scared of?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
I can think of reasons the request would have come/been advised.
That said I think it's pretty weaksauce. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WCOOP threads???
this is pretty pathetic of stars imo
|
|
|