#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
Koko333 (Shawn) works for Bonuswhores.com a site which blacklised AP already. I'm pretty sure he took over my job when we all walked away in December 2006. He is not relevent to any of this AP mess. The others will require more research.
Costaricabill is a large AP affiliate close to the AP guys. He certainly knows all involved but I would seriously doubt he has any involvement. It's likely he just posted from AP. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
I think Shawn worked for AP last year. That is why his posting ip showed AP. Costaricabill was living with Shawn several months ago. Neither is probably involved with this mess but probably know some of the parties that are. I was just digging via the AP ip associated accounts that were listed in this thread.
Thank you, Jim Kuhn Catfish4u [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
tomorrow, the freakanomics blog will have a piece (again) on the situation, and will quote/link to a couple of the latest threads here.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
[ QUOTE ]
tomorrow, the freakanomics blog will have a piece (again) on the situation, and will quote/link to a couple of the latest threads here. [/ QUOTE ] Link to blog, please. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] tomorrow, the freakanomics blog will have a piece (again) on the situation, and will quote/link to a couple of the latest threads here. [/ QUOTE ] Link to blog, please. [/ QUOTE ] http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/20...lown-wide-open/ |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] thats an affiliate ad, we cant expect 2+2 to control that, when Mason said there was no ads I think he meant directly from UB or Absolute. Mat could send an email advising all affiliates look into the Absolute Poker rumors so they can make their own decisions of course. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
Most probably won't make that distinction, though. They'll just note that AP and their logo are still being displayed on 2+2, advising you to click for a sweet deal. People will still want to point fingers at us even if it's indirect.
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
TT,
"thats an affiliate ad, we cant expect 2+2 to control that" Huh? Of course users should expect 2+2 to control that. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
we should not have absolute on our website period, even as an affiliate
|
|
|