Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-19-2007, 09:12 PM
Ikaika Ikaika is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,099
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

If you aren't willing to stick your money in on a flop like that, don't 3bet him preflop.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-19-2007, 09:15 PM
Sniiii Sniiii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 268
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
maybe they don't fold preflop, but they surely don't call a cbet when they miss their set. JJ,99 and occassionally AK is the widest calling range we can put him on IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

If that's the case, then we bet the flop for:
[x]value
[x]protection

[/ QUOTE ]

so 99,JJ and occasionally AK are > 50% of his calling range are they?

this is a really great spot for a flop check.

fwiw, i check flop, think a LOT about betting or checking turn, probably bet and check fold river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Instead of bringing up tons of false points as to why I'd bet the flop, I'll just take back what I said and agree: your line is way better. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-19-2007, 09:18 PM
bozzer bozzer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: in with the 2p2 lingo
Posts: 2,140
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

[ QUOTE ]
If you aren't willing to stick your money in on a flop like that, don't 3bet him preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm not sure i understand this. we are ahead of his range preflop, and probably ahead of a 3bet calling range. we're probably not ahead of a cbet calling range. what's the problem with 3betting then checking this flop? i think there are plenty of better flops out there, but tbh i am really not sure where this flop sits as a % of how good it is - is it in the top 50% of flops for us?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-19-2007, 09:36 PM
LiveNow LiveNow is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: only sort of a bankroll nit now
Posts: 1,151
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

checking sucks because we want to A) charge draws B) get value from worse hands (including draws)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-19-2007, 09:48 PM
bozzer bozzer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: in with the 2p2 lingo
Posts: 2,140
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

[ QUOTE ]
checking sucks because we want to A) charge draws B) get value from worse hands (including draws)

[/ QUOTE ]

what draws/worse hands??? there are literally so few...

edit: i hope i don't sound rude. i'm just very interested in getting to the bottom of this betting the flop consensus.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-19-2007, 10:48 PM
bored bored is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Waiting for a better spot
Posts: 645
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

I check/fold the river. You beat nothing and are trying to represent hands that Villain either already has or already has beat. I don't think he will fold an overpair here.

Also, fold to the river shove/minraise. What hand does he show up with here 20%+ of the time that you beat? The one combo of QQ for the split?

Slowplayed TT or 2 outed JJ... Hmm it's a tossup, I think I'm gonna go with TT.

I probably fire one cbet on this flop and if i get called I shut down. Exploitable? Yes, but not by someone only playing their premium cards, and if it turns out that it is some 20/10 or even 40/30 who just got cold decked for 50 hands I'll be comfortable that I only lost a small/medium pot vs them.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-19-2007, 11:37 PM
mojed mojed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 98
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

So OP, you check the flop hoping for a low card to hit the turn, so that you can get some value from 99, 88 on later streets?

I think betting the flop is better, because while I understand that his calling range is narrow, there are so many turn cards that annoy us that I just want to take the pot down now. Also, villain likely would have 4 bet with KK and AA, so if we can narrow his calling range even to just QQ, JJ, 77 and TT, there are six JJ, one 77 and QQ and three TT. We have have slightly over 50% equity against that range, plus by checking we've let AK draw for free.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-20-2007, 02:03 AM
BukNaked36 BukNaked36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,419
Default Re: QQ... a Series of Tough Decisions? (50 NL)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
checking sucks because we want to A) charge draws B) get value from worse hands (including draws)

[/ QUOTE ]

what draws/worse hands??? there are literally so few...

edit: i hope i don't sound rude. i'm just very interested in getting to the bottom of this betting the flop consensus.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cards we dont want to see on the turn - A, K, any diamond

You're crazy to let AK have a free shot at the turn especially having reraised preflop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.