#2691
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
i could live with the shortstacks if it wasnt for the [censored] ratholing
|
#2692
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
i could live with the shortstacks if it wasnt for the [censored] ratholing [/ QUOTE ] If you bust any short-stack enough times, they will leave the table. Make it a goal of yours. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#2693
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Im talking about mewse, not you or anybody else, though I think no one - or at least only a very few - of the current Party 3-6 regs could beat the games for +7bb/100. I might be wrong though. [/ QUOTE ] I actually agree with this in the current state of 3/6. Earlier in the year sure, a few of the best regs were beating and could sustain beating the game for that much (IMO) but these days 600NL = 4 regs 1 tagfish and 1 shortstack most of the time. A bunch of the 5/10 regs moved down too which toughened up the tables a lot. I 9-12 table a mix of games and beat 2/4 for 7BB/100 but I don't think 3/6 is anywhere near as beatable in its current state. Until about April 400 and 600 were basically the same thing, but now 600 is closer to 1000 imo. Honestly it's not even that different to 10/20 which is also usually 4 regs 1 tagfish and 1 shortstack moron, just the 10/20 regs are obviously better than the 3/6 regs. |
#2694
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Im talking about mewse, not you or anybody else, though I think no one - or at least only a very few - of the current Party 3-6 regs could beat the games for +7bb/100. I might be wrong though. [/ QUOTE ] I actually agree with this in the current state of 3/6. Earlier in the year sure, a few of the best regs were beating and could sustain beating the game for that much (IMO) but these days 600NL = 4 regs 1 tagfish and 1 shortstack most of the time. A bunch of the 5/10 regs moved down too which toughened up the tables a lot. I 9-12 table a mix of games and beat 2/4 for 7BB/100 but I don't think 3/6 is anywhere near as beatable in its current state. Until about April 400 and 600 were basically the same thing, but now 600 is closer to 1000 imo. Honestly it's not even that different to 10/20 which is also usually 4 regs 1 tagfish and 1 shortstack moron, just the 10/20 regs are obviously better than the 3/6 regs. [/ QUOTE ] Just Party or everywhere? |
#2695
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
^ pretty good assesment right there. lately i'm finding 1000nl is often softer than 600nl.
btw there's another russian shortstacker now, cccp1945... these guys all play the same style too. seems a bit sketchy to me. |
#2696
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
^ pretty good assesment right there. lately i'm finding 1000nl is often softer than 600nl. btw there's another russian shortstacker now, cccp1945... these guys all play the same style too. seems a bit sketchy to me. [/ QUOTE ] They're probably on some russian version of 2+2 for nits saying the same thing about us. |
#2697
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
btw there's another russian shortstacker now, cccp1945... these guys all play the same style too. seems a bit sketchy to me. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's kinda worrying, let's get a list of them togethor and compare datamined stats. |
#2698
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] btw there's another russian shortstacker now, cccp1945... these guys all play the same style too. seems a bit sketchy to me. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah that's kinda worrying, let's get a list of them togethor and compare datamined stats. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] they just open push AJ+ and 99+ [/ QUOTE ] |
#2699
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
lol oh ok cool [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
what stack size are they playing? (I havent played in over 2 weeks....) |
#2700
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
i think they buyin for 20bb's
|
|
|