Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #261  
Old 12-14-2006, 10:06 AM
Green Kool Aid Green Kool Aid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 6,518
Default Re: Show Library: Pseudointellectual Books That, in Fact, Suck

[ QUOTE ]
fiction is a diversion: there is nothing to be learned politically, ethically, or otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you could change that sentence to, "I have learned nothing politcally or ethically from fiction."

OR

"I don't value the concepts that one can learn from fiction."

As it stands, the statement you made was false.
Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 12-14-2006, 12:00 PM
Dids Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 215 lbs of fatness
Posts: 21,118
Default Re: Show Library: Pseudointellectual Books That, in Fact, Suck

Veen,

You're a sharp guy, but that's a really [censored] silly post.

We can learn from most anything.
Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 12-14-2006, 12:04 PM
amplify amplify is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Always Already
Posts: 18,027
Default Re: Show Library: Pseudointellectual Books That, in Fact, Suck

[ QUOTE ]
I think TS Eliot is not only the best poet of the 20th century, but so clearly the best poet of the 20th century that it's silly to say otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]
Hart Crane is better. I can prove it, but the proof will not fit in this margin.
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 12-14-2006, 12:27 PM
Quanah Parker Quanah Parker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Stoc:N2SmokNbears
Posts: 1,762
Default Re: Show Library: Pseudointellectual Books That, in Fact, Suck

I really dug Herman Hesse's Steppenwolf but thought Siddhartha was weak.
I was under the impression Siddhartha was his most respected work.
Then again, I'm more psuedo than intellectual.
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:21 PM
Shaddux Shaddux is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Duke University
Posts: 1,778
Default Re: Show Library: Pseudointellectual Books That, in Fact, Suck

[ QUOTE ]
for me it is Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man .

[/ QUOTE ]
Probably one of the greatest books I've ever read. I read a lot too.
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 12-14-2006, 05:36 PM
oneeye13 oneeye13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 999
Default Re: Show Library: Pseudointellectual Books That, in Fact, Suck

[ QUOTE ]
anyone who proudly proclaims they've enjoyed or 'identified with the central thesis' of pretty much any book mentioned in this thread immediately qualifies as irredeemably stupid and hopelessly affected. fiction is a diversion: there is nothing to be learned politically, ethically, or otherwise. i've never met anyone i consider smart who didn't consider the preceding sentences trivially true and almost unworthy of articulation. note that i used the word proudly, please.

there are very few books that are 'pseudo-intellectual' on their own: it depends more on how idiots use the work to justify their own self-confidence and condescension. the works most often abused in this fashion are obv shakespeare's, pynchon's, freud's, marx's, and countless pop sci books from the last two decades.

[/ QUOTE ]

does your circle of mega-geniuses communicate at all, or do they know the truth of every statement and consider all statements, true or false, unworthy of articulation?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.