Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

[LongRedHair]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nielsio, using your own words and not using any links to anywhere ( because all the links you provide have different theories on how things were done) I want to know how YOU think it was done. Could you please answer the following questions :-

1) What kind of explosives were used ?
2) Where were they placed ?
3) When and how were they placed ?
4) How were they detonated ?

[/ QUOTE ]


Can you tell me what the purpose of the exercise is?

[/ QUOTE ]

You are trying to convince people that the twin towers were blown up I just want to know how you think it was done. Those 4 questions are the first that have to be answered to prove they were in fact blown up. So could you please answer the questions and then we can go from there.

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nielsio, using your own words and not using any links to anywhere ( because all the links you provide have different theories on how things were done) I want to know how YOU think it was done. Could you please answer the following questions :-

1) What kind of explosives were used ?
2) Where were they placed ?
3) When and how were they placed ?
4) How were they detonated ?

[/ QUOTE ]


Can you tell me what the purpose of the exercise is?

[/ QUOTE ]

You are trying to convince people that the twin towers were blown up I just want to know how you think it was done. Those 4 questions are the first that have to be answered to prove they were in fact blown up. So could you please answer the questions and then we can go from there.

[/ QUOTE ]


I'm trying to get people to open up to the idea of skepticism towards this event. That involves both discrediting the official story, and it involves offering alternative explanations and opening up evidence which allows one to evaluate.

The fact that different people have different ideas for how exactly these things occured is not a problem in providing links and resources. This seems a case of double standards as well btw. The officials have provided different answers and non-answers to just about every aspect of the events.

I'd also like to remind you of the default position. It's not up to anyone to prove that it was an inside job. It's up to the officials to provide answers to questions, because they were the ones in control. And they are also the ones covering endless amounts of facts and evidences that the public has a right to see and know. They are the ones claiming they had nothing to do with it and that it was OBL and some independent 'terrorists'. Such a cartoonish myth is completely unacceptable to me.


I find it hard to understand that people still buy into this myth so easily with staunch defending of the government, while it has been proven that the government-released OBL videos are all tampered with and that the government has lied about this event from day one.


[ QUOTE ]
“I don’t think anybody could have predicted that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile.” – National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, 5/16/02

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
The Pentagon Mass Casualty project (codenamed Pentagon Mascal) was a mock terrorist contingency exercise that was held in the Office of the Secretary of Defense conference room from October 24 to October 26, 2000. The exercise required emergency response teams, members of the defense protective services, and U.S. government officials to conduct emergency simulations in preparation for a possible plane crash into the Pentagon.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_MASCAL


[/ QUOTE ]

[LongRedHair]

How are you going to to get people to open up to the idea of skepticism towards this event when you wont even answer 4 simple questions ? They are simple basic questions that have to be answered so why wont you answer them ?

[ikestoys]

guys Nielso isn't interested in the truth, he's interested in the evil of government in general... theres no point in even trying to convince him

[kerowo]

[ QUOTE ]
guys Nielso isn't interested in the truth, he's interested in the evil of government in general... theres no point in even trying to convince him

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, but it is an excellent reason to post lolcats:

[Hopey]

[ QUOTE ]
guys Nielso isn't interested in the truth, he's interested in the evil of government in general... theres no point in even trying to convince him

[/ QUOTE ]

[Bill Haywood]

[ QUOTE ]
How are you going to to get people to open up to the idea of skepticism towards this event when you wont even answer 4 simple questions ?

[/ QUOTE ]

As one who tried long and hard to engage with him, I can assure you there is no quicker way to get him to change the subject than to talk specifics. He never, ever, answers. Rather than spend the next six weeks trying to get him to see sense, you might just read this entire thread from the beginning. That will cure you.

[Money2Burn]

I'm so pissed that I just wasted a perfectly good Sunday afternoon reading this entire thread. It should be deleted and Nielso should be banned.

[tame_deuces]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm so pissed that I just wasted a perfectly good Sunday afternoon reading this entire thread. It should be deleted and Nielso should be banned.

[/ QUOTE ]

In all fairness this thread will probably get most doubters to turn away from these half-assed conspiracy theories, and censorship/banning only makes him a martyr and probably in some weird way give legitimacy to what he is saying.

Who knows, maybe this thread was started to cloud up the truth - maybe he is one of 'them'. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] (Yes, I'm j/k obv).

[bubaloo]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If the President was involved in this plot why was he so stunned when he heard about the first plane?

[/ QUOTE ]

The presidency is generally regarded as a puppet.




[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

ture, but tbh he looks more guilty than stunned in the shot at the school imo. also, why are the secret service not dragging him out of the building when his visit to that school was well publicized?