#251
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
Dude with your roll you should be moving up easy.
|
#252
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] have to move back down to 50NL for awhile. see you guys at the tables! [/ QUOTE ] How was the shot at 100NL? [/ QUOTE ] If he is Blackice with the computer avatar then he ran into a 600nl and 1000nl reg who I was sweating (my coach) on 100nl during a coaching session where I was sweating him. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] it's ok, one session i tilted and went to 1000nl myself. your coach didn't/doesn't intimidate me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#253
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
Does anyone have BIG samples of stats against some of the 10nl regs, i've been playing 10nl for a few weeks (just moved from party) and have noticed the same regs EVERYTIME i play my sessions
I guess guys like (only a few of the top of my head): Danpil Nertz Jordta I've been wondering how many hands some of these guys actually log at 10nl |
#254
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
I dont have any hands on anyone of them.
I just got 5k hands at NL10 though. |
#255
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
Danpil has been at NL10 for a long time. I started playing NL10 in March and he was there. He's 17/6/1.7 over a pretty decent sample size.
|
#256
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
Yeah, i have Danpil at 16/3/0.7 over 700 hands and he'll play nitty, then do something weird, like limp 87s in EP and call an 8bb raise OOP...He doesn't seem very solid in these instances...its weird
|
#257
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[ QUOTE ]
Also, Waylanderl seems like a good player to me, but somehow is a huge loser. [/ QUOTE ] I gave him a little coaching session about a year ago. This was when he was just starting out and he has moved up pretty nicely as I see. May have to talk to him again since it seems he is losing. Hopefully I can help him out a little. Could you post some of his stats for I can see what he is doing wrong. Thanks. |
#258
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
Anyone else ran into Bores Easily and Bioharm? Both have talked about using PT and pokerstove but I don't think it is helping either one of them.
|
#259
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[ QUOTE ]
LOLDONKBETZ Any thoughts on me? Went up over 25 buyins at NL25 in my first 2 days on stars, since then I've hit an 8k or so bad streak. You should see my EV graph, ugh. Also played about 10k hands at nl50. If you see me berating people just say sup bro, chill. Thanks! [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, it's definitely fun playing against you. Sorry to hear about the bad run, I hope you didn't play the way you played against me as I can see some possible problems there if you run into the wrong kind of players. A few thoughts regarding stats, although I just have the 193 hands from that one session on you, I have your WTSD at 0.2 and your W$SD at 0.3, which seems a bit low to me. Might just be the sample size, though. |
#260
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars Regulars Thread: Part II
[ QUOTE ]
Does anyone have BIG samples of stats against some of the 10nl regs, i've been playing 10nl for a few weeks (just moved from party) and have noticed the same regs EVERYTIME i play my sessions I guess guys like (only a few of the top of my head): Danpil Nertz Jordta I've been wondering how many hands some of these guys actually log at 10nl [/ QUOTE ] In the past 5 days over 10k hands at FR I have about 100 hands on them, and at 21k of 6max I have none. |
|
|