|
|
#243
07-14-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weed Brownies + 200/400 NL = ??????
after watching this 100x gets so many funny details:
When Krantz in the beginning touches pr1 when he sees the turn. Man I would love to see what you were doing when pr1 limp/3 bettet him. 
|
|
#245
07-14-2007, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weed Brownies + 200/400 NL = ??????
LOOOL!!!! omg xD
|
|
#246
07-14-2007, 11:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weed Brownies + 200/400 NL = ??????
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I keep watching this over and over. [/ QUOTE ] I couldn't explain to anybody why this rules, but it really does. Strat question though: Is it really so unthinkable that in that game somebody is showing up with 8x even after a limp-rr? [/ QUOTE ] perkys prob never folding tpgk [/ QUOTE ] This I understand. I'm just more wondering why Team Brownie thinks that when Perky sees 86 he'll flip. I just can't imagine that preflop play in that game is so predictable than you can ever really exclude a hand range.
|
|
#247
07-14-2007, 11:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weed Brownies + 200/400 NL = ??????
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I keep watching this over and over. [/ QUOTE ] I couldn't explain to anybody why this rules, but it really does. Strat question though: Is it really so unthinkable that in that game somebody is showing up with 8x even after a limp-rr? [/ QUOTE ] perkys prob never folding tpgk [/ QUOTE ] This I understand. I'm just more wondering why Team Brownie thinks that when Perky sees 86 he'll flip. I just can't imagine that preflop play in that game is so predictable than you can ever really exclude a hand range. [/ QUOTE ] Dids: not only did krantz say he's never limp-reraised in this game, i believe he said he's never limped in HU. so yeah, when they limp-reraise with total trash and hit trips, there's good reason to believe they will ownhissoul fortherestofhisgoddamnlife
|
|
#249
07-14-2007, 11:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weed Brownies + 200/400 NL = ??????
[ QUOTE ]
"krantz say he's never limp-reraised in this game, i believe he said he's never limped in HU." CLEARLY KRANTZ IS EXPLOITABLE AND WILL SOON GO BUST. [/ QUOTE ] How is never open limping exploitable? Do you even play poker?
|
|
#250
07-14-2007, 11:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Weed Brownies + 200/400 NL = ??????
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I keep watching this over and over. [/ QUOTE ] I couldn't explain to anybody why this rules, but it really does. Strat question though: Is it really so unthinkable that in that game somebody is showing up with 8x even after a limp-rr? [/ QUOTE ] perkys prob never folding tpgk [/ QUOTE ] This I understand. I'm just more wondering why Team Brownie thinks that when Perky sees 86 he'll flip. I just can't imagine that preflop play in that game is so predictable than you can ever really exclude a hand range. [/ QUOTE ] Umm I think they say that cause they are really really baked and really really proud of themselves
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
