|
View Poll Results: What's the favourite? | |||
L/c | 0 | 0% | |
L/R | 1 | 11.11% | |
B/c | 0 | 0% | |
B/R | 8 | 88.89% | |
I mix it up to keep the monkey and the rest of the table off balance. | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#231
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
nm, i found youtube
|
#232
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
If people really want to get around the sharkscope thing someone could write a little VB browser that has a webbrowser control on it. That would work until stars stars taking screenshots of our desktops...
Or if you have 2 computers just look it up on the computer you're not playing on. |
#233
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
holy [censored] juventus was loaded back in 95
|
#234
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
Anybody know the answer to this? [/ QUOTE ] Party is able to detect sites that you previously visited, even if you didn't have the client open at the time. I assume that Stars is also able to do this - although they may obtain more info - which may exonerate you or may further condemn you. |
#235
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
Party is able to detect sites that you previously visited, even if you didn't have the client open at the time. [/ QUOTE ] Probably just checking for cookies from the banned site? |
#236
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Party is able to detect sites that you previously visited, even if you didn't have the client open at the time. [/ QUOTE ] Probably just checking for cookies from the banned site? [/ QUOTE ] ...possibly - but the sites could simply not use cookies to circumvent this. They may look directly at your browsing history. |
#237
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
I think I suck at poker ... 2nd hand, PP 5c/10c full ring; no reads on villains.
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (9 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font> <font color="#C00000">Button ($4.52)</font> Hero ($9.90) BB ($9.90) UTG ($2.18) <font color="#C00000">UTG+1 ($8.10)</font> MP1 ($9.21) MP2 ($2.10) MP3 ($11.81) CO ($3.95) Preflop: Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls $0.10, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, CO calls $0.10, Button calls $0.10, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $0.6</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls $0.50, CO folds, Button calls $0.50. Flop: ($2) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $0.9</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises to $1.9</font>, Hero folds, UTG+1 calls $2.02. Turn: ($6.82) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> River: ($6.82) 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Final Pot: $6.82 Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF"> UTG+1 has 8h 8s (two pair, tens and eights). Button has Qc Jh (two pair, jacks and tens). Outcome: Button wins $6.82. </font> |
#238
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
I just reported my first douche who was berating a guy about his sharkscope stats. I'm curious to know what they'll do. I also asked this: [ QUOTE ] I know you've recently added Sharkscope.com to your disallowed software list--is it only not allowed during actual game play? I'm assuming I am free to use the site any other time I am not actually playing. Which brings me to another question--If I visit Sharkscope.com while away from the tables, will your detection methods still indicate that I am using the site? [/ QUOTE ] Anybody know the answer to this? [/ QUOTE ] The Pokerstars policy announcement seems to answer your question. Here is the relevant bit: "5. If the service’s operation pre-dates the establishment of these guidelines, there shall be no “grandfather clause” for existing data. 100% of historical profitability data must be removed from view until such time as a player explicitly opts in as above. Any Service Operator found to be in violation of these rules risks having their access to PokerStars’ game client restricted and/or the service impeded, including but not limited to the warning of players who access the Service while the PokerStars client is open." This seems to imply accessing Sharkscope while not playing is still ok. |
#239
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
edit im retarded
|
#240
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: [censored] thread, September, READ RULES IN TOP POST
[ QUOTE ]
Well I just sharkscoped myself and everyone's stats have been reset to 0. [/ QUOTE ] No way [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
|
|