Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

[winningfish]

Bush sucks, tick.
CIA sucks, tick maybe.
FBI sucks, tick.

Bush or CIA or FBI brought down the WTC... if you tick this you deserve to be in the asylum.

That's really all there needs to be said.

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
Bush sucks, tick.
CIA sucks, tick maybe.
FBI sucks, tick.

Bush or CIA or FBI brought down the WTC... if you tick this you deserve to be in the asylum.

That's really all there needs to be said.

[/ QUOTE ]


It is public knowledge that the FBI had infiltrated and financially and otherwise supported both the 1993 WTC bombing terrorists as well as the 2001 WTC bombing terrorists.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/...in521223.shtml

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emad_Salem


I suggest you have a listen to a recording of a conversation between an FBI agent and one of the double agents:

http://nwo.media.xs2.net/tape/SalemWBAI.mp3

[tame_deuces]

It isn't public knowledge, it is what you and some likeminded individuals make out of some minor 'evidence'. And when it isn't enough, as is shown throughout this thread, supporting facts and 'science' is fabricated to fit the story at hand. If anything, if there is some truth in it, it is clogged up by conspiracy theorists drowning it in half-truth and falsehoods - so you would be helping the conspiracy badguys (if any) to get away with it.

And yes, I am angry and annoyed, because you people are devoting so much time and energy on this, and a lot of people are listening to you and effort and energy which could have been used to focus on real and tangible mis-use of power is vasted on a case resting on the idea that some ten thousand people keeps a billion dollar secret about a genocide of its own populace in the world's 20th most politically transparent country. Seriously, the US seems unable to even keep cosmic top secret documents away from the press.

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
It isn't public knowledge, it is what you and some likeminded individuals make out of some minor 'evidence'.

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you listen to the tape?

[kerowo]

Thread saved, again.

[Nielsio]

9/11/2001: USA Today Reveals FBI Theory That World Trade Center Towers Destroyed By Explosives

Lauren Ashburn: "Joining me is Jack Kelley, now he is a foreign correspondent - war correspondent - and just came back from Israel. He has some information about these attacks. Jack, what can you tell us happened, first in New York."

Jack Kelly: "Um, apparently what appears to happen was that at the same time 2 planes hit the building, that there ... that <font color="red">the FBI most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with explosives underneath the buildings, which also exploded at the same time and brought both of them down.</font>"

Lauren Ashburn: "Now that's the first time were hearing that, so 2 planes and explosives that were in the building, is that correct?"

Jack Kelley: "That is the working theory at this point, that is still unconfirmed but that is what the FBI is going on at this point."

http://www.911blogger.com/node/11712

edit: youtube link of the vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-npAbNl2ihY .



This 'working theory' was quickly buried and never to be heard of again. The 9/11 commission report does not even mention is as a theory and uses it's own proposed theory and then starts to adjust and only mention facts trying to support that theory.

For example like the inside trading situation: "we couldn't like the trading back to the terrorists and therefore this information is of no value".

[kerowo]

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user ***

[/ QUOTE ]

[vhawk01]

Its funny how if you use the word "buried" instead of "dismissed as wrong" it makes it sound more like a conspiracy.

[Mempho]

Why does there have to be a conspiracy theory to prove your point. Everything you need to know is already proven:

1) THEY KNEW about the threat
2) THEY KNEW that it would involve airplanes
3) THEY KNEW that the trade centers were likely targets
4) THEY KNEW that it was from Al Queda
5) THEY KNEW that the organization had the ability to pull it off
6) THEREFORE, THEY KNEW the threat was credible
7) THEY ALSO KNEW the threat was imminent

8) AND YET, they did absolutely nothing to mitigate the threat because THEY WANTED IT TO HAPPEN.

All of that is proven and yet the public is so stupid that they don't realize that their government implicitly, through inaction, agreed to this attack and desired for it to happen.