![]() |
#221
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2. Born in 1800 or later?
living/dead doesn't split things evenly enough... |
#222
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
2. Born in 1800 or later? [/ QUOTE ] Yes. |
#223
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, if chuckles' theories are right, and I think they are, the key here is to narrow things down to some sort of list that the person is on, and then go by name on that list.
|
#224
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Before we can narrow it down, occupation is needed.
|
#225
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
2. Born in 1800 or later? living/dead doesn't split things evenly enough... [/ QUOTE ] on that basis, if you're looking at famous people, male/female isn't a great split either. Maybe staight male? |
#226
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 2. Born in 1800 or later? living/dead doesn't split things evenly enough... [/ QUOTE ] on that basis, if you're looking at famous people, male/female isn't a great split either. Maybe staight male? [/ QUOTE ]Excellent point. |
#227
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
3) Political figure?
|
#228
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
3) Political figure? [/ QUOTE ] Yup. |
#229
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
4) European?
|
#230
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmm
Do we now try to divide by country, and then find a list of political figures in a given country, or do we divide by role, and find a list by role? If the person wasn't a head of state or head of government, the latter would be harder. |
![]() |
|
|