#201
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
I'm interested more in the coaching than staking, but the staking is surely part of it so that's fine too. I'd want to do 2/4+ but will play 1/2 under guidance. Been at 1/2 for quite some time. My winrate was 2-3x what it is now until our country celebrated its independence in early July, then it suddenly went down the shitter. So either the games got tough, I got bad, or I just ran bad (lean towards the last one, which led to the 2nd one). I appear to be a decent winner at 1/2 PLO as well, but that is always up for debate...does anyone ever truly know their winrate in that game?? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
Can we skip the intelligence part if I have enough potential?
|
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
[ QUOTE ]
quality, not quantity! [/ QUOTE ] contradictory DUCY |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
I play at Partypoker/FullTilt/IPoker. My BR management is pretty conservative. I want a stake for NL200.
NL25 = ~ 10k hands NL50 = ~ 86k hands NL100 = ~ 41k hands NL200 = ~ 2k hands |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
Wow. Nice 45 degree graph.
|
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
[ QUOTE ]
I play at Partypoker/FullTilt/IPoker. My BR management is pretty conservative. I want a stake for NL200. NL25 = ~ 10k hands NL50 = ~ 86k hands NL100 = ~ 41k hands NL200 = ~ 2k hands [/ QUOTE ] Uhh your roll has to be over $10k, why do you want a stake for $200nl? |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I play at Partypoker/FullTilt/IPoker. My BR management is pretty conservative. I want a stake for NL200. NL25 = ~ 10k hands NL50 = ~ 86k hands NL100 = ~ 41k hands NL200 = ~ 2k hands [/ QUOTE ] Uhh your roll has to be over $10k, why do you want a stake for $200nl? [/ QUOTE ] Are these progressive? It's pretty interesting that your $/100 doesn't seem to go up, but I guess it could be a combination of games getting tougher and moving up in stakes. |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
[ QUOTE ]
i'd take a guy who has 3k posts over 200 posts anyday, even if the guy with 3k posts looks on paper to be a worse player. [/ QUOTE ] <--- |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i'd take a guy who has 3k posts over 200 posts anyday, even if the guy with 3k posts looks on paper to be a worse player. [/ QUOTE ] <--- [/ QUOTE ] Woohoo, point that arrow this way too [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Re: looking to stake people part 3
[ QUOTE ]
Uhh your roll has to be over $10k, why do you want a stake for $200nl? [/ QUOTE ] Unfortunately I had to cashout most of my winnings because of private reasons and my bankroll right now is only like 4k $ and I donīt think that is enough when 8tabling 200NL. At least I wouldnīt feel comfortable with it. I prefer 50 buyins. [ QUOTE ] Are these progressive? It's pretty interesting that your $/100 doesn't seem to go up, but I guess it could be a combination of games getting tougher and moving up in stakes. [/ QUOTE ] My winrate doesnīt increase so much because I mix limits when I play. I am looking for soft tables which means that I am sometimes playing 4tables 50NL and 4 of 100NL. Another thing is that I was beating 50NL with like 9ptbb/100 which I think is hard to sustain at 100NL while 8tabling. |
|
|