|
View Poll Results: how old are you | |||
<18 | 7 | 3.78% | |
18-20 | 47 | 25.41% | |
21-24 | 64 | 34.59% | |
old as shit | 67 | 36.22% | |
Voters: 185. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
What were the results of the game? Like which offers were accepted? [/ QUOTE ] I'll post it tomororw |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, I am a big fan of this nomination. Two of my 'will not wins' are up for eviction. It also appears clear that poor Nich is everyone's go to, it won't offend anyone, choice for eviction. [/ QUOTE ] iirc, Mets wasn't one of your 'not wins' but maybe i'm wrong- I know Nich is though and I know somebody bet on Mets to win against me so lets eliminate Mets...sadly I know its not going to happen. The one good thing about this though, is that maybe Nez gets put up soon for his actions, and I know him going would be good for me too |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, my dream team is: AlexJacob - He actually pays poker and stuff, which gets him some respect in POG. He also runs under the radar, but he can really go nuts posting when the occasion calls for it. Mets - He will either be last or first. He is sticking his neck out, but I think that can work in this game. I also wouldn't be surprised if he is the first out. HBE - My favorite for the competition. He is hard not to like and he can beat out people who may have played the game better, but been an ass in the process. (see Mets above) Herbie - At least I know he will put the work in to try to win. If you are too UTR you just can't win because of the alliances and the jury vote. You need to be a schemer, but no in the Luckay and Clown sense where you end up pissing off everyone. So there you have it. Now, I will also give 4-1 on the opposite proposition. I choose four players who will not win. If I am right, you owe me $5, if one of my picks wins then I owe you $20. [/ QUOTE ] yeah books, Mets is actually one of your picks to win |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the pick 4 players to win prop is still on the table, at least until Herbie selects the people to be voted on [/ QUOTE ] I'll put 5 on chuck, herbie, alex, and nez. [/ QUOTE ] these are Boiler's picks, and I have that other bet with Books on Luckay, Nich, Siegmund and Clown not winning, and of course the pool which is not going well for me with dmk going round 1 |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
Zurv,
I just wanted to let you know that this has been one of the most enjoyable games to observe in my time in POG (and that counts lurking too). [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] Keep up the great work! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
just so you guys know, after the next player is eliminated (or even now if you really want to gamble) there will be a pick 3 players to win at even money wager being offered.
With all the information that available, surely thats +ev. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
LOL @ Mets reaction to being nominated....
Even changed his avator... I hope Nez has his votes lined up... |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
Lets see:
If Mets loses the veto competition... It will be Mets vs X 8 players voting... I assume Luckay votes against Mets plus the 3 other "secret" members will put the vote at best 4-4 with Nez kicking Mets out the door... Mets NEEDS to win the veto competition. |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
Zurvan,
Keep focusing on this game please and let POG Mole become you're last priority.(If it isn't already) |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
Diary Room
Cuz it's been driving me nuts: [ QUOTE ] (11:32:08 AM) ZurvanCanada: So, when/how/why did you change your mind on the noms? (11:32:30 AM) nez: Long story, don't have time right now (11:32:31 AM) nez: But (11:32:36 AM) nez: I pretty much screwed myself (11:32:41 AM) nez: Siegmund is pissed (11:32:50 AM) nez: Bottom line (11:33:00 AM) nez: I did it due to the theory that Mets had a strong team (11:33:02 AM) nez: When really (11:33:04 AM) nez: They probably don't (11:33:21 AM) ZurvanCanada: Oh, OK (11:33:41 AM) ZurvanCanada: pm me the details when you have time, if you're so inclined (11:33:47 AM) nez: will do (11:33:57 AM) nez: I feel safe with Luckay anyway [/ QUOTE ] I've bolded the most shocking, naive statement in the history of POG. |
|
|