#201
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] But yeah, i recognize that 1000 isnt a great number either. You still havent answered my question of how many you think is a significant sample. [/ QUOTE ] It is probably in the range of 5-10K. [/ QUOTE ] Ah, I see. So if I were to run at a -20% ROI over say, 2000 tourneys, I shouldnt worry about it because its nowhere near a significant sample size. After all, everyone has downswings. This is the advice you would give? [/ QUOTE ] You're being really stupid about this. Just set up a prop bet and shut us all up with your shkillz |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You still havent answered my question of how many you think is a significant sample. [/ QUOTE ] (ZOMG INCOMING SPACEGRAVY REFERENCE) He won 25k at the 60s in like 3 weeks and broke even over a 2k stretch of games. I'd say alot more than 1000 for a reasonable sample size. [/ QUOTE ] I LOVE LOVE LOVE that I called you guys making this silly spacegravy reference and you went ahead and made it anyway. Just because somebody had a breakeven stretch of 2000 SNGs doesnt mean that a persons entire 2000 sample SNG history is meaningless. How can you not understand this? |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
what is it called when you take something to an extreme example? I forget the name.
No if you are running at -20% roi for 2k tourneys things can be inferred, that you'd be a losing player. Your filtered results comes up with 416.. not 2k though. With a 33% roi we can infer you are probably a winning player although with much less confidence than someone that has lost for 2k sngs. |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You still havent answered my question of how many you think is a significant sample. [/ QUOTE ] (ZOMG INCOMING SPACEGRAVY REFERENCE) He won 25k at the 60s in like 3 weeks and broke even over a 2k stretch of games. I'd say alot more than 1000 for a reasonable sample size. [/ QUOTE ] I LOVE LOVE LOVE that I called you guys making this silly spacegravy reference and you went ahead and made it anyway. Just because somebody had a breakeven stretch of 2000 SNGs doesnt mean that a persons entire 2000 sample SNG history is meaningless. How can you not understand this? [/ QUOTE ] Your results are not meaningless, they are an indication. Not more, not less. And now stop this pls, all. It's just stupid. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] But yeah, i recognize that 1000 isnt a great number either. You still havent answered my question of how many you think is a significant sample. [/ QUOTE ] It is probably in the range of 5-10K. [/ QUOTE ] Ah, I see. So if I were to run at a -20% ROI over say, 2000 tourneys, I shouldnt worry about it because its nowhere near a significant sample size. After all, everyone has downswings. This is the advice you would give? [/ QUOTE ] You're being really stupid about this. Just set up a prop bet and shut us all up with your shkillz [/ QUOTE ] yeah, i set up a counter offer on the prop, no one has responded. |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] But yeah, i recognize that 1000 isnt a great number either. You still havent answered my question of how many you think is a significant sample. [/ QUOTE ] It is probably in the range of 5-10K. [/ QUOTE ] Ah, I see. So if I were to run at a -20% ROI over say, 2000 tourneys, I shouldnt worry about it because its nowhere near a significant sample size. After all, everyone has downswings. This is the advice you would give? [/ QUOTE ] This is all retarded. The more you play, the more significant your sample size is. That's really all there is to it. |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
You said you wanted better odds.. what kind of odds?
|
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
[ QUOTE ]
what is it called when you take something to an extreme example? I forget the name. No if you are running at -20% roi for 2k tourneys things can be inferred, that you'd be a losing player. Your filtered results comes up with 416.. not 2k though. With a 33% roi we can infer you are probably a winning player although with much less confidence than someone that has lost for 2k sngs. [/ QUOTE ] son of a [censored] bitch how and where are you filtering this? |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
sharkscope.. advanced search, you have to have a subscription.
|
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $10k at the 27s in 1 month challenge
edit
|
|
|