|
|
#191
06-20-2006, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
Boris, whats up? Al West looks interesting, didn't your biys win 10 straight? I hate those [censored].
|
|
#192
06-21-2006, 06:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
Oakland is one of the luckiest teams in the AL, the third luckiest in the AL according to Pythag. Only the Red Sox and White Sox have been luckier.
Texas is playing right at its Pythag and Oakland should be about 4 games behind Texas right now. The M's should be in second place. New York, Seattle, and Cleveland are the three unluckiest AL teams.
|
|
#193
06-26-2006, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
[ QUOTE ]
Oakland 37 31 .544 ---- Streak: Won 9 WTF is this [censored] boris???!? they were under .500 like a week ago [/ QUOTE ] A couple weeks late since I've been moving, but this is completely standard. I thought it'd happen after a couple dozen more games though.
|
|
#194
06-26-2006, 08:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Oakland 37 31 .544 ---- Streak: Won 9 WTF is this [censored] boris???!? they were under .500 like a week ago [/ QUOTE ] A couple weeks late since I've been moving, but this is completely standard. I thought it'd happen after a couple dozen more games though. [/ QUOTE ] Rangers are five games ahead of them in third-order wins. If you mean that Oakland getting lucky is completely standard, then you'd be right.
|
|
#195
06-26-2006, 09:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Oakland 37 31 .544 ---- Streak: Won 9 WTF is this [censored] boris???!? they were under .500 like a week ago [/ QUOTE ] A couple weeks late since I've been moving, but this is completely standard. I thought it'd happen after a couple dozen more games though. [/ QUOTE ] Rangers are five games ahead of them in third-order wins. If you mean that Oakland getting lucky is completely standard, then you'd be right. [/ QUOTE ] I guess when they start determining the playoff teams by 3rd order wins that will mean more...
|
|
#196
06-26-2006, 10:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Oakland 37 31 .544 ---- Streak: Won 9 WTF is this [censored] boris???!? they were under .500 like a week ago [/ QUOTE ] A couple weeks late since I've been moving, but this is completely standard. I thought it'd happen after a couple dozen more games though. [/ QUOTE ] Rangers are five games ahead of them in third-order wins. If you mean that Oakland getting lucky is completely standard, then you'd be right. [/ QUOTE ] I guess when they start determining the playoff teams by 3rd order wins that will mean more... [/ QUOTE ] I guess when they start determining their crappy offense. Mark Ellis- he's so moneyball.
|
|
#197
06-26-2006, 11:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Oakland 37 31 .544 ---- Streak: Won 9 WTF is this [censored] boris???!? they were under .500 like a week ago [/ QUOTE ] A couple weeks late since I've been moving, but this is completely standard. I thought it'd happen after a couple dozen more games though. [/ QUOTE ] Rangers are five games ahead of them in third-order wins. If you mean that Oakland getting lucky is completely standard, then you'd be right. [/ QUOTE ] I guess when they start determining the playoff teams by 3rd order wins that will mean more... [/ QUOTE ] I guess when they start determining their crappy offense. Mark Ellis- he's so moneyball. [/ QUOTE ] He was one of the top 2B in the game last year, and has been pretty terrible this year along with most of the rest of the offense. What is your point?
|
|
#198
06-26-2006, 11:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: June 15, 2006 - WOOT!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Oakland 37 31 .544 ---- Streak: Won 9 WTF is this [censored] boris???!? they were under .500 like a week ago [/ QUOTE ] A couple weeks late since I've been moving, but this is completely standard. I thought it'd happen after a couple dozen more games though. [/ QUOTE ] Rangers are five games ahead of them in third-order wins. If you mean that Oakland getting lucky is completely standard, then you'd be right. [/ QUOTE ] I guess when they start determining the playoff teams by 3rd order wins that will mean more... [/ QUOTE ] I guess when they start determining their crappy offense. Mark Ellis- he's so moneyball. [/ QUOTE ] He was one of the top 2B in the game last year, and has been pretty terrible this year along with most of the rest of the offense. What is your point? [/ QUOTE ] The point is that the big suckaz won't have a shot. Even if they make the playoffs the mediocrity will continue.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
