Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 12-10-2006, 05:03 PM
BCPVP BCPVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,759
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
Your parents get rich off of the work that other people do. The workers on your parents farm would be much better off if they ran the farm themselves and didn't have your dad's hand in their pockets.

[/ QUOTE ]
And now we're back to owner's not doing anything. Snowball, you suck at this.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 12-10-2006, 05:23 PM
ianlippert ianlippert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,309
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
He makes a real contribution by coordinating labor, obtaining clients and ordering supplies. In a socialist society, he would perform these tasks as an employee of the construction cooperative.

[/ QUOTE ]

You forgot the most important one: Risking his own capital
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 12-10-2006, 05:28 PM
ianlippert ianlippert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,309
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know how it could be clearer. Your parents get rich off of the work that other people do. The workers on your parents farm would be much better off if they ran the farm themselves and didn't have your dad's hand in their pockets.



[/ QUOTE ]

So why dont they start their own business? We live in a capitalist society but theres nothing stopping the 'workers' from starting their own business.

It really surprises me how many people on a poker forum dont understand risk management. If I invest $1 million into a business that has a 10% chance of being successful, I have to make $9 million in profits when I am successful just to break even. If you start cutting into successful businesses profits they will just stop taking the risks that need to be taken for a prosperous economy.
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 12-10-2006, 05:29 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He makes a real contribution by coordinating labor, obtaining clients and ordering supplies. In a socialist society, he would perform these tasks as an employee of the construction cooperative.

[/ QUOTE ]

You forgot the most important one: Risking his own capital

[/ QUOTE ]

lol arguingincirclesaments. Did you read the posts above? Snoball just talked about "risking his own capital."
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 12-10-2006, 05:32 PM
ianlippert ianlippert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,309
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
lol arguingincirclesaments. Did you read the posts above? Snoball just talked about "risking his own capital."



[/ QUOTE ]

I stopped really reading once it seemed like people were arguing for some kind of marxist exploitation of labour theory.
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 12-10-2006, 05:37 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]

So why dont they start their own business? We live in a capitalist society but theres nothing stopping the 'workers' from starting their own business.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you have the necessary capital to open your own company? I'll wager large sums that the overwhelming majority of factory workers don't, and the system is designed to keep it that way. The people are paid enough to survive and keep coming back to the job, not to save up and start their own business.

Perhaps I'll put it this way. I'm sure most factory workers would like to own their own business, but when the choice is work in the factory and live, albeit meagerly, or try to start your own business and let your family starve, then that's no choice at all. The capitalist are, as the ACist like to say, holding a gun and saying: be exploited or starve.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 12-10-2006, 05:46 PM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

between those inconsistencies and his inability to grasp that contributions of capital are as relevant as contributions of labor, snowball his hopelessly mired in Marxist fantasies

[/ QUOTE ]

I understand that firms have two inputs--capital and labor--but that capital didn't build itself. Pray tell, Sir, when you follow production back to the very basic parts, what exists? Not captial and labor. Just labor. Capital must necessarily come from someone's labor.


Edit: And please, insult my economic knowledge or something. I'm an econ major at one of the US's top universities.

[/ QUOTE ]

there are plenty of students majoring in all kinds of fields that dont understaand their specialties. (Im not saying you dont, just that your status doesnt qualify you.)

And no, if you follow it back there isnt just labor, there is also intellectual capital. If you want to play semantics and claim that intellectual capital = "mental labor", dont bother, because that has nothing to do with snowballs preposterous positions on exploitation and the equivalence of profit and theft.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 12-10-2006, 06:08 PM
Money2Burn Money2Burn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida, imo
Posts: 943
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


My mom is part owner of their farm, she does no work on the farm. She just keeps the books. How is that exploitive? Or are you talking about "silent partners" who just put up some money and then reap the profits later on?

If the later is the case how are they exploiting people? They took significant risk putting up substantial sums on a business that had no guaruntee of being sucessful. I have no problem with allowing them to reap the rewards of a good investment. Aparently you do, why?


[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know how it could be clearer. Your parents get rich off of the work that other people do. The workers on your parents farm would be much better off if they ran the farm themselves and didn't have your dad's hand in their pockets.

I really don't care about the risk your dad took. Would you care about the risk a slaveowner took? No! Because that economic mode of production is terrible, and shouldn't ever exist. The private ownership of the means of production is backwards, inefficient, and bad for humanity. The fact that your dad took a risk - with money he probably didn't earn in the first place, and bought land from someone who probably stole it to begin with - shouldn't hold back generations and generations of humans from living in a better world.

Hopefully after the revolution, your mom and dad can find real jobs. If your mom is as good at bookeeping as you imply, they'll probably hire her on the farm after the worker's seize control. Maybe she can put a good word in for your dad? Does he have any talents besides making "good investments?"

I haven't received a PM from you to get my UB/AP/Neteller info re: the bet you lost vs. me. PAY WHAT YOU OWE!

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Do you have the necessary capital to open your own company? I'll wager large sums that the overwhelming majority of factory workers don't, and the system is designed to keep it that way. The people are paid enough to survive and keep coming back to the job, not to save up and start their own business.

Perhaps I'll put it this way. I'm sure most factory workers would like to own their own business, but when the choice is work in the factory and live, albeit meagerly, or try to start your own business and let your family starve, then that's no choice at all. The capitalist are, as the ACist like to say, holding a gun and saying: be exploited or starve.


[/ QUOTE ]

I will address both of you all in this post because my example deals with points both of you are tryiig to make.

First, snoball, you say my dad started his business with money he didn't earn, this is completely wrong. My dad worked for years, FOR ANOTHER FARMER, and saved his money. He then rented land and equipment from the very same farmer he had originally worked for to start his own business.

Dano, this proves where you are wrong, the business owners aren't the ones "paying their workers just enough to live and keep working there" if the employees don't manage their money well it's their fault. My dad did it along with countless other entroprenurs in this country. Snoball, do you think owners of big business have just magicly always had their cash? Take Wayne Hyzinga (sp?), he built his fortune starting out with one garbage truck and today he is one of those rich, evil, capitalist, parasites which you despise so much.

Find real jobs? Either of my parents has worked harder in their lives to get where they are than you ever will. The fact that you can't see that shows there is some serious disconnect in your view of how things are.

As for the bet, there was no proper acceptance and no consideration therefore I owe you nothing [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 12-10-2006, 06:10 PM
Dan. Dan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The European Phenom
Posts: 3,836
Default Re: A sub-point

Oh, nevermind. If money2burn's dad did it, that means everyone can. Hell, someone somewhere at sometime once won the lottery. Why don't all factory workers do that?
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 12-10-2006, 06:13 PM
Money2Burn Money2Burn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida, imo
Posts: 943
Default Re: A sub-point

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

So why dont they start their own business? We live in a capitalist society but theres nothing stopping the 'workers' from starting their own business.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you have the necessary capital to open your own company? I'll wager large sums that the overwhelming majority of factory workers don't, and the system is designed to keep it that way. The people are paid enough to survive and keep coming back to the job, not to save up and start their own business.

Perhaps I'll put it this way. I'm sure most factory workers would like to own their own business, but don't have the intellect or the fiscal responsibility to create a succesfull one, so they keep working at the factory resenting their evil bosses who are stealing from them

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.