|
|
#11
04-14-2006, 01:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2001FP worth it?
Don't 2001FP's have pretty slow refresh rate? So they kinda suck for playing other games with. Maybe I should have just one 2001FP and the one I have now as "main" screen.
Right now I have Samsung 17" LCD Syncmaster 730BF TCO-99 600:1, DVI-D, 4ms, 1280x1024 (lost the link) and play 4-6 tables with party resizing, works pretty good but 6tables = slight overlap 
|
|
#13
04-14-2006, 02:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2001FP worth it?
[ QUOTE ]
WHY WOULD YOU GET A 2001FP GET A 2007FP THEY ARE LIKE WAY WAY BETTER [/ QUOTE ] When yvesaint does it, it's funny. When you do it, it sucks. That's it. KoW
|
|
#14
04-14-2006, 02:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2001FP worth it?
[ QUOTE ]
Don't 2001FP's have pretty slow refresh rate? So they kinda suck for playing other games with. Maybe I should have just one 2001FP and the one I have now as "main" screen. [/ QUOTE ] The 2001FP is fine for playing games. I've never noticed any ghosting in HL2 or whatever.
|
|
#15
04-14-2006, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2001FP worth it?
The thing is that flatscreens with 10+ ms delay are basically unplayable on a high level as in-game the delay stacks up which equals another 100 or more ping. So up until a year or whatever ago flatscreens were worthless especially in FPS games, but then they introduced monitors with like 4 and 2 ms delay which improved the performance by alot.
Anyways 2001FP's seem to have like 16ms base-delay which is way too high for me so I'll have to find something better or just keep my overlap
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
