Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-13-2006, 12:32 AM
Barrin6 Barrin6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 100k hands 5ptbb+ nl1/2 b4 nl2/4
Posts: 3,732
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

Don't you think calling UTG is a little iffy? I was taught to always fold or raise UTG.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-13-2006, 07:26 AM
oreopimp oreopimp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: the American Bukkake
Posts: 4,926
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

dont think I have any calling UTG, I have LR which = limp vs loose opponents (raise if they CC), raise tight opponents.

The CC part is something I added (late at night I think), dunno why, and it can probably be discussed.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-13-2006, 04:00 PM
The Bride The Bride is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 430
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

[ QUOTE ]
I'm wondering what's your VPiP/PFR filtered for 5-6 handed?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-13-2006, 04:12 PM
bnorthro bnorthro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hating poker
Posts: 1,500
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm wondering what's your VPiP/PFR filtered for 5-6 handed?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Likewise. I play a style similar to the original 6max chart that was floating around a while back. My fold BB to steal is around 60% (trying to get it down) and my ATSB is like ~35% (trying to get it up) and I've been around 21/15 for a long time. This chart defenitely adds hands for me, but I'm curious how LAGGY you end up.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-13-2006, 06:43 PM
ElAnimal ElAnimal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 391
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

Thanks for putting in the time. I've got questions about the main chart that aren't covered in the legend:

1. What does R2 stand for? (like Q2s in the SB. When are you raising Q2s?)
2. What does R3 stand for? (like K5 in the SB)
3. What's the difference between R and 3B when they're both under the "Facing a Raise" section? Wouldn't they both be 3-bets?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-13-2006, 11:55 PM
Brain Brain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,364
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

For those of you without Excel: Excel Viewer
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-14-2006, 05:00 PM
stenaf stenaf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

I don't know if I'm missing things here, but isn't "opener" supposed to be an open raise? Why are there "RL", "R2" etc in there? If you open raise there are no callers before you.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-15-2006, 09:29 PM
tgo007 tgo007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 73
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

does everyone always raise utg with KTs? I'm new, so I still have a lot to learn.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:57 AM
poker_n00b poker_n00b is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,669
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

Opener column. On the button with 22-44 u say "R2". Does this mean raise if less than 2 limpers? So if we have one limper we should still raise 22 otb?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-16-2006, 01:48 PM
oreopimp oreopimp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: the American Bukkake
Posts: 4,926
Default Re: Hand Chart...version 3. my version

its a tricky situation as a chart is a general thing. anyway tight blinds Id def raise most limpers...other situations sometimes just call, sometimes fold. R2 essentially means raise first in, limp with 2 or more. one limper is tricky because u have to take the blinds into account and who the limper is. Im usually never folding in this siuttion though, but if u say have lag blinds behind u I can see calling or mucking with a limper.

as PJN (cnfzzed) said in a chat about this:

[10:42] <pjnGlue> oreo
[10:42] <pjnGlue> in that situation
[10:42] <pjnGlue> i would transcend
[10:42] <pjnGlue> and achieve a higher state of being
[10:43] <pjnGlue> if this path is unavailable to you
[10:43] <pjnGlue> i think you should call
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.